Minimization of Photosynthesis due to Air Pollution

  • G. Psaras
  • M. Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki
  • N. S. Margaris
Conference paper


In this work the leaf structure of Phlomis fruticosa and Urginea maritima from a strongly perturbated, by means of air pollution, phryganic ecosystem in Attica (Greece) was studied in comparison to the leaf structure of the same plants from a similar phryganic ecosystem free of air pollutants. The first, light microscope detected, detrimental effects of air pollutants refer to chloroplasts. The latter are fewer and smaller in the leaves of the affected plants. A second effect of air pollution on the P. fruticosa leaves is the shape of the chloroplast containing mesophyll cells, which appear to be more irregular than in normal plants. Besides, leaves of U. maritima exhibit colorless areas, that is areas without chloroplasts, where the mesophyll cell layers have been practically reduced. In other words the leaf of U. maritima shows abundant colorless constricted areas in its blade. It is reasonable to presume that the above effects on chloroplasts leads to the minimization of photosynthesis. Therefore, our results justify the low primary production of the most air polluted ecosystems as well as the lower biomass estimations in these, available in the literature.


Leaf Structure Lower Epidermis Cross Sectioned Leaf Borax Solution Palisade Parenchyma Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kozlowski TT, 1980. Bioscience 30:88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Legge AH, 1980. In: PR Miller (ed.), Effects of Air Pollutants on Mediterranean and Temperate Forest Ecosystems. USDA/Forest Service, Pasific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Margaris NS, Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki M, Tselas S, Loukas L and Petanidou D, 1983. Tech. Rep. 2, EEC (Contract No B 6612/9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller PR and McBride JR, 1975. Effects of air pollutants on forest. In: Mudd JB and Kozlowski TT (eds.), Responses of plants to air pollutants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pickett-Heaps JD, 1969. J. Cell Sci., 4:397.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Posthumus AC, 1982. In: Steubing L and Jäger H-J (eds.), Monitoring of air pollutants by plants. Methods and Problems. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winner WE and Bewley JD, 1978a. Oecologia 33:311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winner WE and Bewley JD, 1978b. Oecologia 35:221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winner WE, 1981. In: Margaris NS and Mooney HA (eds.), Components of productivity of Mediterranean-climate regions. Basic and Applied Aspects. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Psaras
    • 1
  • M. Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki
    • 2
  • N. S. Margaris
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of General Botany, Department of BiologyUniversity of AthensGreece
  2. 2.Division of Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations