Skip to main content

The Present State of Utility Theory

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 47))

Summary and Conclusion

The present state of the utility theory can be summarized by four propositions:

  1. 1.

    The utility function u (x) derived from the vNM (von Neumann & Morgenstern) axiomatics is not the cardinal utility of the certain outcome x ; this last utility is a different function v (x).

  2. 2.

    The relation between u and v expresses the utility of uncertainty. If u = v, as assumed in /14/, the expected utility, a preference functional among uncertain prospects, expresses a risk neutral behavior.

  3. 3.

    The axioms of vNM shall be dropped. In particular, single stage and multiple equivalent bets are not indifferent, i. e. of equal utility. This propos ition, which requires the abandonment of the independance axiom as expressed by axiom 3:C:b of vNM and by the formulations of Samuelson /2/ and Malinvaud /3/, is necessary in order to be able to establish a general utility function of uncertain prospects such that it covers the intrinsic utility of uncertainty.

  4. 4.

    Such a general utility function is non-linear in probalities.

At present three schools are offered. The first, represented among others by the three anthors quoted in Section 2 of this paper, tries to formulate and empirically verify the points 1 and 2 of this conclusion. The second, of, among others, the three authors quoted in Section 3 of this paper, tries to prove conclusions 3 and 4.

My proposal of 1966 – 1974 /19 to 25/ assumes all four conclusions. But it lacks formal proof and is also critized as it can lead to violations of the principle of dominance. It is shown in /22/ and recalled here that such violations are in fact fruitful explanations of possible actual behaviors and can be considered as rational.

Our younger followers should seek a synthesis of these schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

A. Econometrica

  1. K.J. Arrow Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk-taking Situations (19),4, October 1951 404–438

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.A. Samuelson Probability, Utility and the Independence Axiom (20),4, October 1952

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Malinvaud Note on the vNM Strong Independence Axiom (20),4 October 1952 679–680

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Allais Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationel Devant le Risque (21), Oct 1953 503–546

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.J. Freund The introduction of Risk Into a Programming Model (24),3, July 1956 253–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.W. Pratt Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large (32)1-2, Jan. Apr. 1964 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Bernard On Utility Functions (35)5 supp. 1967 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.E. Stiglitz Behavior Towards Risk With Many Commodities (37),4 Oct. 1969 660–668

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Malinvaud First Order Certainty Equivalence (37),4 Oct. 1969 706–718

    Google Scholar 

  10. W.R. Russell & Tae Kun Seo Admissible Sets of Utility Functions in Expected Utility Maximization (46),1 Jan. 1978 181–184

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Selden A New Representation of Preferences Over Certain and Uncertain Consumption Pairs. The Ordinal Certainty Equivalent Hypothesis (46),5 Sep. 1978 1045–1060

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Kahneman & A Tversky An Analysis of Decision Under Risk (47),2 March 1979 263–292

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.J. Machina “Expected Utility” Analysis Without the Independence Axiom (50),2 March 1982 277–324

    Google Scholar 

B. Others

  1. J. von Neumann & O. Morgenstern The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior Princeton 1947

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds) Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox 1979 Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Camacho Cardinal Utility and Decision Making Under Uncertainty /27/, pp. 347–371

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Krzystofowicz Risk Attitude Hypotheses of Utility Theory /27/ pp. 201–217

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Mccord &Amp; R. de Neufville Fundamental Deficiency of Expected Utility /27/ pp. 181–201

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Bernard Réduction du paradoxe de St. Petersbourg par la théorie de l’utilité, C.R. de l’Académie des Sciences 1964 (259), 3168–3170

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Bernard Jeu de St. Petersbourg généralisé C.R. de l’Académie des Sciences 1966 (262) 240–242

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Bernard Sur les fonctions d’utilité Revue Fse de R.O. 1966 No 41 323–352

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Bernard On Utility Functions, Theory & Decision 1974 (5) 205–242

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Bernard Note on Two Applications of the CEVR utility function, Theory & Decision 1978 (9) 199–203

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Bernard Review of /15/ Kyklos vol 34 1981 Fasc, 1 106–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Bernard Deterrence, Utility and Rational Choice — A Comment Theory & Decision 1982 (14) 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Bernard On Utility Functions; Present State Theory & Decision 1984 (17) 97–100

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.P. Stigum & F. WinstøP (Eds) Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory With Applications Reidel 1983

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. WinstøP & O. Hagen Progress in Utility and Risk Theory Reidel 1984

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.A. Samuelson St. Peterburg Paradoxes … Journal of Economic Literature (15) 1977

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.J. Arrow in /27/ pp. 19–32 Behavior Under Uncertainty and Its Implications for Policy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernard, G. (1986). The Present State of Utility Theory. In: Daboni, L., Montesano, A., Lines, M. (eds) Recent Developments in the Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory. Theory and Decision Library, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4616-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4616-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8551-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4616-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics