Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 47))

Abstract

There are, it can be argued, two dominant approaches to rational choice extensively used in decision theory and economics:

  1. (1)

    Internal consistency: Rational choice is seen, in this approach, simply in terms of internal consistency of choice.

  2. (2)

    Self-interest pursuit: The rationality of choice is identified here with the unfailing pursult of self-interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G.: 1983, “Loyalty Filters”, American Economic Review 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M.: 1953, “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rational devant le Risque: Critique des Postulates et Axiomes de l’Ecole Amèricaine”, Econometrica 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M., and O. Hagen (eds.): 1979, Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox: Contemporary Discussion of Decisions under Uncertainty with Allais’ Rejoinder, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1951a, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edition (1963) Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1951b, “An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Welfare Economics”, in J. Neymann, ed., Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Symposium of Mathematical Statistics, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1959, “Rational Choice Functions and Orderings”, Economica 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1970, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1982, “Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics”, Economic Inquiry 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1983, “Behaviour under Uncertainty and Its Implications for Policy”, in Stigum and Wenstφp (eds.), 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J., and F.H. Hahn: 1971, General Competitive Analysis, Holden-day, San Francisco, republished (1979) North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.E.: 1982, “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty”, Operations Research 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, K., and J. Mossin: 1968, Risk and Uncertainty, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J.: 1984, “Uncertainty and Fairness”, Economic Journal 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.E.: 1976, “Democratic Preference Functions”, Journal of Economic Theory 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J.S., L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter, and H.F. Sonneschein (eds.): Preference, Utility and Demand, Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.: 1982, “Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies? Further Thoughts about Interpretation of Experimental Data on Probability Judgment”, Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D., P. Suppes, and S. Siegel: 1957, Decision Making: An Experimental Approach, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: 1959, A Theory of Value, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P: 1967, “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment”, Journal of Political Economy, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J.H.: 1974, “Axiomatic Theories of Choice, Cardinal Utility and Subjective Probability: A Review”, in J.H. Drèze (ed.), Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., and A. Tversky (eds.): 1967, Decision Making Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: 1978, Logic and Society, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1973, The Theory o f Social Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1981, “Subjective Expected Utility: A Review of Normative Theories”, Theory and Decision, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P., and N.E. Sahlin: 1982, “Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking and Decision Making”, Synthese 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.J.: 1976, “Changing Tastes and Coherent Dynamic Choice”, Review of Economic Studies 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P.J.: 1982, “Consequentialism and Rationality in Dynamic Choice under Uncertainty”, Technical Report 387, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C.: 1966, “A General Theory of Rational Behaviour in Game Situations”, Econometrica 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C.: 1977, Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger, H.G.: 1973, “Ordinal Preference and Rational Choice”, Econometrica 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O.: 1977, The Passions and the Interest, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O.: 1982, Shifting Involvements, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R.C.: 1965, The Logic of Decision, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edition (1983), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky: 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovik, and A. Tversky: 1983, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S: 1976, “Choice Based on Preference”, mimeographed, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa: 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1974, “On Indeterminate Probabilities”, Journal of Philosophy 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1982, “Ignorance, Probability and Rational Choice”, Synthese 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., and R. Sudgen: 1982, “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty”, Economic Journal 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D., and H. Raiffa: 1957, Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R.: 1968, “Descriptive and Normative Implications of Decision Theory Postulates”, in K. Borch and J. Mossin, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.: 1981, “Rational’ Decision Making vs. ‘Rational’ Decision Modelling?”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.:1982, “‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independence Axiom”, Econometrica 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.: 1983, “Generalized Expected Utility Analysis and the Nature of Observed Violations of the Independence Axiom”, in B. Stigum and F. Wenstϕp (eds.) 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClennen, E.F.: 1983, “Sure-Thing Doubts”, in B. Stigum and F. Wenstϕpp (eds.), 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H.: 1982, Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1970, The Possibility of Altruism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1980, “The Limits of Objectivity”, in S. McMurrin (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons, Cladendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C: 1973, “Path Independence, Rationality and Social Choice”, Econometrica 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H.: 1968, Decision Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P.: 1931, “Truth and Probability”, in F.P. Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M.K.: 1971, “Rational Choice”, in Chipman, Hurwicz, Richter and Sonneschein (eds.). 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.: 1947, The Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C.: 1984, “Self-Command in Practice, in Policy, and in a Theory of Rational Choice”, American Economic Review 74, Papers and Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, F.: 1984, Having Reasons: An Essay on Rationality and Sociality, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T: 1972, “Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum”, Nous 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1970a, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco, Holden-Day, republished by North-Holland (1979) Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1970b, “Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability”, Econometrica, 38; 972 “A Correction”, Econometrica

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1971, “Choice Functions and Revealed Preference”, Review of Economic Studies 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1972, “Behaviour and the Concept of Preference”, Economica 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1977a, “Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination”, Econometrica 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1977b, “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1979, “Utilitarianism and Welfarism”, Journal of Philosophy 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1982a, Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Blackwell, Oxford, and Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1982b, “Rights and Agency”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1983, “Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1984a, Resources, Values and Development, Blackwell, Oxford: Blackwell and Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1984b, “Rationality, Interest and Identity”, written for a festschrift for A.O. Hirschman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1957, Models of Man, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R: 1985, “Why Be Consistent? A Critical Analysis of Consistency Requirements in Choice Theory”, Economica 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K.: 1976, “Rational Choice and Revealed Preference”, Review of Economic Studies 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K.: 1983, Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigum, B.P., and F. Wenstcpp (eds.): 1983, Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A.: 1975, “A Critique of Expected Utility Theory: Descriptive and Normative Considerations”, Erkenntnis 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D, Kahneman: 1974, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”, Science 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O, Morgenstern: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • William, B.: 1973, “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, in J. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.: 1982, Moral Luck, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sen, A. (1986). Rationality and Uncertainty. In: Daboni, L., Montesano, A., Lines, M. (eds) Recent Developments in the Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory. Theory and Decision Library, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4616-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4616-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8551-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4616-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics