Skip to main content

Som and the Binding Theory

  • Chapter
Topics in Scandinavian Syntax

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 5))

Abstract

The purpose of this article is twofold. On the one hand, an attempt will be made to show that the framework of GB-theory permits an explanatory account of the properties of the Norwegian relative marker som. On the other hand, this result depends on two specific modifications of the Binding Theory, and the success of the analysis presented here constitutes evidence for these modifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bennis, Hans and Liliane Haegeman: 1983, ‘On the Status of Agreement and Relative Clauses in West Flemish’, in W. de Geest and Y. Putseys (eds.), Sentential Complementation, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders: 1983, ‘The Finite Sentence in Swedish and English’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 3, University of Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, Bent and Per Anker Jensen: 1982, ‘Some Remarks on the Use of Danish (at) der in Embedded Interrogative and Relative Clauses’, unpublished ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1976, ‘French Relative que’, Recherches Linguistiques 2–3, Université de Paris VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1980a, ‘Extensions of Binding and Case-marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1980b, ‘On Certain Differences between French and English’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1980c, ‘ECP Extensions’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 93–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1981, ‘French Inversion Chains’, unpublished ms., Université de Paris VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1982a, ‘Predicates and Arguments, Verbs and Nouns’, paper presented as the GLOW conference, Paris 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1982b, ‘Connectedness’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 223–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1975, ‘Dutch as an SOV Language’, Linguistic Analysis 1, 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oraviita, Irmeli and Knut Tarald Taraldsen: 1983, ‘Case-marking and Parasitic Gaps in Finnish’, unpublished ms., University of Tromsø.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1982a, ‘Complementizer-trace Phenomena and the Nominative Island Condition’, The Linguistic Review 1, 297–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —: 1982b, Paths and Categories, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, Christer: 1983, ‘Germanic Word Order and the COMP/INFL Parameter’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 2, University of Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, Knut Tarald: 1978, ‘The Scope of Wh-Movement in Norwegian’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 623–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1979, ‘On the Theoretical Interpretation of a Class of “Marked” Extractions’, in A. Belletti, L. Brandi and L. Rizzi (eds.), The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, pp. 475–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1980, ‘A Case-conflict in Norwegian Topicalization’, in NELS XI, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1981, ‘The Head of S in Germanic and Romance’, in T. Fretheim and L. Hellan (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Tapir, Trondheim, pp. 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1982, ‘Causatives and the Head of S in Norwegian and Romance’, paper presented at the GLOW conference, Paris 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1983, Parametric Variation in Phrase-Structure: A Case Study, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: 1984, ‘Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences between Swedish and Norwegian’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, University of Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkermalm, Åke: 1967, Modern Svenska, Gleerups, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taraldsen, K.T. (1986). Som and the Binding Theory. In: Hellan, L., Christensen, K.K. (eds) Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4572-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4572-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2167-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4572-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics