The Double Object Construction in Danish

  • Michael Herslund
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 5)


Locative Pattern Indirect Object Secondary Predication Prepositional Object Scandinavian Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, John M.: 1977, On Case Grammar, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste, Emile: 1966, ‘“Etre” et “avoir” dans leurs fonctions linguistiques’, in: Problèmes de linguistique générale, Gallimard, Paris, pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Diderichsen, Paul: 1957, Elementœr dansk grammatik, Gyldendal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  5. Emonds, Joseph: 1972, ‘Evidence that Indirect Object Movement is a Structure Preserving Rule’, Foundations of Language 8, 546–561.Google Scholar
  6. —: 1976, A Transformational Approach to Syntax, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. —: 1980, ‘Inversion généralisée NP — α: marque distinctive de l’anglais’, Langages 60, 13–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fillmore, Charles: 1965, Indirect Object Constructions in English and the Ordering of Transformations, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  9. Hansen, Aage: 1949, ‘On the So-Called Indirect Object in Danish’, in Recherches Structurales 1949, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag, Copenhagen, vol. 5, pp. 198–202.Google Scholar
  10. —: 1967, Moderne Dansk, vol. 1–3, Grafisk Forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, Erik: 1967, Sprogiagttagelse, Gjellerup, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  12. Herslund, Michael: 1982, ‘Dativ. En syntaktisk-semantisk analyse af á N strukturer på fransk’, RIDS 100, Romance Department, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  13. —: 1984, ‘Particles, Prefixes and Preposition Stranding’, in L. Heltoft and F. Sørensen (eds.), Topics in Danish Syntax, Nydanske Studier 14, Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen, pp. 34–71.Google Scholar
  14. — and Finn Sørensen: 1982, ‘Syntaks og Leksikologi. Indledning til en valensgrammatisk analyse af fransk og dansk’, SAML 9, Department of Applied and Mathematical Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, pp. 33–83.Google Scholar
  15. Jackendoff, Ray: 1977, X̄ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobsen, Bent: 1978, Transformational-Generative Grammar, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Lyons, John: 1968, Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Mikkelsen, Kristian: 1911, Dansk Ordföjningslœre, Reitzel, Copenhagen (1975).Google Scholar
  19. Oehrle, Richard: 1978, ‘Semantic Import of an Investigation of the English Double Object Construction’, in W. Dressler and W. Meid (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists, Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Innsbruck, pp. 214–217.Google Scholar
  20. Postal, Paul: 1974, On Raising. One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Herslund

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations