Advertisement

Swedish and the Head-Feature Convention

  • Robin Cooper
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 5)

Abstract

The HEAD-FEATURE CONVENTION (HFC) has been proposed in the literature on Generalized Phrase-structure Grammar (GPSG) as a mechanism whereby the features on a node are essentially the same as the features on its head node. There are a number of ways in which the convention could be made precise. The discussion of it in Gazdar, Pullum, and Sag (1982), Gazdar and Pullum (1981) does not come down firmly on any one of the possibilities. Gazdar and Pullum (1982) opt for the exact matching requirement discussed below. In section 1. I shall discuss the possibilities, and then in the remaining sections 2.–4. I shall discuss three classes of data from Swedish (well known to scholars of Swedish linguistics) which bear on the choice. My main conclusion will be that HFC should be regarded as a markedness convention rather than as an absolute condition, because however we formulate the matching requirements between the features on a node and those on its head constituent there seem to be examples in Swedish which do not obey HFC.

Keywords

Relative Clause Definite Article Grammatical Gender Natural Gender Semantic Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper, Robin: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. —: 1984, ‘Svenska nominalfraser och kontext-fri syntax’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 7, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gazdar, Gerald and Geoffrey Pullum: 1981, ‘Subcategorization, Constituent Order and the Notion “head”’, in The Scope of Lexical Rules, T. Hoekstra, H. v. d. Hulst and M. Moortgat, eds., Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. —: 1982, ‘Generalized Phrase-Structure Grammar: A Theoretical Synopsis’, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  6. — and Geoffrey Pullum and Ivan Sag: 1982, ‘Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar’, Language 58, 591–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hellan, Lars: 1978, ‘X̄-Syntax, Categorial Syntax, and Logical Form’, in Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium 1977, T. Fretheim and L. Hellan, eds., Trondheim University, Trondheim.Google Scholar
  8. —: 1980, Toward an Integrated Theory of Noun-Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Trondheim, Trondheim.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Cooper

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations