Spinoza: Scientist and Theorist of Scientific Method

  • David Savan
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 91)


Two questions concern me in this paper. First, what is the place and importance of Spinoza’s work as a practising scientist? Second, what did Spinoza think were the right rules to follow in carrying out specific scientific investigations?1 Coupling these two questions will, I believe, throw some new light on Spinoza’s work and thought. Our second question will occupy the larger part of this paper, since the answer depends upon Spinoza’s theory of the necessary inadequacy of the human mind and our almost total ignorance of how things are “linked together in the universal system of nature (totiusque naturae ordinem et cohaeren-tiam)” (Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Gebhardt III, p. 191). In order to focus the discussion of the second question, I will introduce it by pointing to an apparent contradiction in what Spinoza wrote concerning the study of the emotions. In a well known passage in the Ethics he appears to take an a priorist stand, while in an echoing passage in the Tractatus Politicus he appears to take an empiricist position. The resolution of this apparent contradiction is central to an understanding of Spinoza’s theory of scientific method.


Common Property Adequate Idea Common Notion Hypothetical Explanation Individual Thing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Geuroult, Martial: 1974, Spinoza II: L’âme (Ethique, II), Aubier-Montaigne, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Pfeiffer, R. H.: 1941, Introduction to the New Testament, Harper, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Simon, Richard: 1678: Histoire critique du Vieux Testament, Billaine, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Spinoza, Baruch: 1883, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, transl, by R. H. M. Elwes, Bohn edition, George Bell and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  5. Spinoza, Baruch: 1910a, Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Weil-Being, transl, and ed. by A. Wolf, A. and C. Black, London.Google Scholar
  6. Spinoza, Baruch: 1910b, Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione, transl, by A. Boyle, Everyman edition, Dent, London.Google Scholar
  7. Spinoza, Baruch: 1925, Spinoza Opera, ed. by Carl Gebhardt, 4 vols., Carl Winter, Heidelberg. (Cited as ‘Gebhardt’ in the text.)Google Scholar
  8. Spinoza, Baruch: 1928, The Correspondence of Spinoza, transl. By A. Wolf, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  9. Spinoza, Baruch: 1930a, Ethics, transl, by William Hale White, in John Wild (ed.), Spinoza: Selections, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Spinoza, Baruch: 1930b: Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione, transi, by R. H. M. Elwes, in John Wild (ed.), Spinoza: Selections, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Spinoza, Baruch: 1958, Tractatus Politicus, transl, by A. G. Wernham, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Spinoza, Baruch: 1963, Earlier Philosophical Writings; The Cartesian Principles and Thoughts on Metaphysics, transl, by Frank A. Hayes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Savan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations