Abstract
It was disclosed in the mid- to late-1950’s that cultured higher plant cells could develop into plantlets via a series of developmental events closely resembling zygotic embryogenesis. As the information base grew, it was recognized that this route of multiplication offered potential for mass cloning of elite specimens. Even so, it became apparent rather quickly that not nearly enough was known about the factors controlling somatic embryogenesis so that these ideas could be applied with any degree of confidence to very many species or cultivars (6).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ammirato PV: 1984. Induction, maintenance, and manipulation of development in embryogenic cell suspension cultures, pp. 139–151. In: IK Vasil (ed). Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Vol. 1, Laboratory procedures and their applications. Academic Press, Orlando.
Fitter MS, AD Krikorian: 1981. Recovery of totipotent cells and plantlet production from daylily protoplasts. Ann. Bot. 48:591–597.
Fitter MS, AD Krikorian: 1983. Plant protoplasts: Some guidelines for their preparation and manipulation in culture. CalBiochem-Behring, Division of American Hoechst Corporation, LaJolla.
Fitter MS, AD Krikorian: 1986. Variation among plants regenerated from protoplasts of diploid daylily. In: FA Valentine (ed). Progress and prospects in forest and crop biotechnology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
George EF, PD Sherrington: 1984. Plant propagation by tissue culture. Handbook and directory of commercial laboratories. Exegetics Ltd., Eversley, Basingstoke, England.
Krikorian AD: 1982. Cloning higher plants from aseptically cultured tissues and cells. Biol. Rev. 57:151–218.
Krikorian AD, RP Kami: 1979. Clonal micropropagation of daylilies, pp. 835–836. In: WR Sharp, PO Larsen, EF Paddock, V Raghavan (eds). Plant cell and tissue culture: Principles and applications. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.
Krikorian AD, RP Kann: 1981. Plantlet production from morphogenetically competent cell suspensions of daylily. Ann. Bot. 47:679–686.
Krikorian AD, SA O’Connor, MS Fitter: 1983. Chromosomal stability in cultured plant cells and tissues, pp. 541–581. In: WR Sharp, DA Evans, PV Ammirato, Y Yamada (eds). Handbook of plant cell culture. Vol. 1. Techniques for propagation and breeding. Macmillan Publications, New York.
Krikorian AD, SA Staicu, RP Kann: 1981. Karyotype analysis of a daylily clone reared from aseptically cultured tissues. Ann. Bot. 47:121–131.
Krikorian AD, RP Kann, SA O’Connor, MS Fitter, SS Cronauer, DL Smith: 1986. The range of morphogenetic responsiveness in aseptically cultured daylily tissues and cells. In: FA Valentine (ed). Progress and prospects in forest and crop biotechnology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Mullins MG: 1982. Tissue culture and plant propagation: Coming down to earth. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 31:162–165.
Stewart RN: 1978. Ontogeny of the primary body in chimeral forms of higher plants, pp. 131–160. In: S Subtelny, IM Sussex (eds). The clonal basis of development. Academic Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krikorian, A.D., Kann, R.P., O’Connor, S.A., Fitter, M.S. (1986). Totipotent Suspensions as a Means of Multiplication. In: Zimmerman, R.H., Griesbach, R.J., Hammerschlag, F.A., Lawson, R.H. (eds) Tissue culture as a plant production system for horticultural crops. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4444-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4444-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8477-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4444-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive