Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture ((PSBA,volume 2))

Abstract

It was disclosed in the mid- to late-1950’s that cultured higher plant cells could develop into plantlets via a series of developmental events closely resembling zygotic embryogenesis. As the information base grew, it was recognized that this route of multiplication offered potential for mass cloning of elite specimens. Even so, it became apparent rather quickly that not nearly enough was known about the factors controlling somatic embryogenesis so that these ideas could be applied with any degree of confidence to very many species or cultivars (6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammirato PV: 1984. Induction, maintenance, and manipulation of development in embryogenic cell suspension cultures, pp. 139–151. In: IK Vasil (ed). Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Vol. 1, Laboratory procedures and their applications. Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fitter MS, AD Krikorian: 1981. Recovery of totipotent cells and plantlet production from daylily protoplasts. Ann. Bot. 48:591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fitter MS, AD Krikorian: 1983. Plant protoplasts: Some guidelines for their preparation and manipulation in culture. CalBiochem-Behring, Division of American Hoechst Corporation, LaJolla.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fitter MS, AD Krikorian: 1986. Variation among plants regenerated from protoplasts of diploid daylily. In: FA Valentine (ed). Progress and prospects in forest and crop biotechnology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. George EF, PD Sherrington: 1984. Plant propagation by tissue culture. Handbook and directory of commercial laboratories. Exegetics Ltd., Eversley, Basingstoke, England.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krikorian AD: 1982. Cloning higher plants from aseptically cultured tissues and cells. Biol. Rev. 57:151–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krikorian AD, RP Kami: 1979. Clonal micropropagation of daylilies, pp. 835–836. In: WR Sharp, PO Larsen, EF Paddock, V Raghavan (eds). Plant cell and tissue culture: Principles and applications. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krikorian AD, RP Kann: 1981. Plantlet production from morphogenetically competent cell suspensions of daylily. Ann. Bot. 47:679–686.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krikorian AD, SA O’Connor, MS Fitter: 1983. Chromosomal stability in cultured plant cells and tissues, pp. 541–581. In: WR Sharp, DA Evans, PV Ammirato, Y Yamada (eds). Handbook of plant cell culture. Vol. 1. Techniques for propagation and breeding. Macmillan Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krikorian AD, SA Staicu, RP Kann: 1981. Karyotype analysis of a daylily clone reared from aseptically cultured tissues. Ann. Bot. 47:121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krikorian AD, RP Kann, SA O’Connor, MS Fitter, SS Cronauer, DL Smith: 1986. The range of morphogenetic responsiveness in aseptically cultured daylily tissues and cells. In: FA Valentine (ed). Progress and prospects in forest and crop biotechnology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mullins MG: 1982. Tissue culture and plant propagation: Coming down to earth. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 31:162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart RN: 1978. Ontogeny of the primary body in chimeral forms of higher plants, pp. 131–160. In: S Subtelny, IM Sussex (eds). The clonal basis of development. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krikorian, A.D., Kann, R.P., O’Connor, S.A., Fitter, M.S. (1986). Totipotent Suspensions as a Means of Multiplication. In: Zimmerman, R.H., Griesbach, R.J., Hammerschlag, F.A., Lawson, R.H. (eds) Tissue culture as a plant production system for horticultural crops. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4444-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4444-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8477-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4444-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics