Abstract
With the completion of Cleanthes’ two illustrative analogies, Hume makes it fall to Demea to reply to Cleanthes. His reply loses sight of whatever philosophical objections may be brought to bear on these analogies, and he concentrates on his own objections to anthropomorphism which amount to showing that anthropomorphism misrepresents the deity, since (for Demea) the deity is incomprehensible.1 In other words, Demea only succeeds in showing that anthropomorphism is incompatible with mysticism! — a position which no one will deny. But Demea’s reply has an important role to play in that it opens the way in Part IV of the Dialogues for the exchange between Cleanthes and Philo.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hume : Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited and with commentary by Nelson Pike, the Bobbs-Merril Co. Inc., Indianapolis, New York, 1970.
Pike, 157.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tweyman, S. (1986). Hume’s Dialogues: Part IV. In: Scepticism and Belief in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idees, vol 106. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4341-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4341-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8429-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4341-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive