Skip to main content

Comparing Direct and Indirect Benefit Estimation Approaches

  • Chapter
Measuring Water Quality Benefits

Part of the book series: International Series in Economic Modeling ((INSEM,volume 3))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter compares direct and indirect approaches for measuring individuals’ values of improved water quality. Generally, economists prefer data that are derived from circumstances in which individuals have a financial stake in the outcome. Thus, it is not surprising that they prefer the indirect approaches for estimating benefits, all else being equal. For many environmental applications, however, all else is not equal. Either indirect approaches are unavailable, or the motives for observable household decisions cannot be untangled, given existing theory and data. Because of these reasons, direct methods will remain a prominent part of the benefit estimation picture. Whether economists will alter the order of preferred approaches is another matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop, R. C., and T. A. Heberlein, 1979, “Measuring Values of Extra Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 61, No. 5, December 1979, pp. 926–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Richard C., and Thomas A. Heberlein, 1986, “Does Contingent Valuation Work?” in R. G. Cummings, D. S. Brookshire, and W. D. Schulze, eds., Valuing Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Methods, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael, Nancy E., and Kenneth E. Monnell, 1980, “Calculating Equivalent and Compensating Variation for Natural Resource Environments,” Land Economics, Vol. 56, No. 1, February 1980, pp. 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, David S., Mark A. Thayer, William D. Schulze, and Ralph C. d’Arge, 1982, “Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches,” American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 1, March 1982, pp. 165–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Donald T., and Donald W. Fiske, 1959, “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multi Tract-Multi Method Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 56, 1959, pp. 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, Charles J., Anthony C. Fisher, and V. Kerry Smith, 1976, “An Econometric Evaluation of a Generalized Consumer Surplus Measure: The Mineral King Controversy,” Econometrica, Vol. 44, No. 6, November 1976, pp. 1259–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Ronald G., David S. Brookshire, and William D. Schulze, 1986, editors and contributing authors, Valuing Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, William H., V. Kerry Smith, and Matthew McGivney, 1983, A Comparison of Alternative Approaches for Estimating Recreation and Related Benefits of Water Quality Improvements, Environmental Benefits Analysis Series, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. Michael, 1984, “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 66, No. 3, August 1984, pp. 332–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry A., 1981, “Exact Consumer’s Surplus and Deadweight Loss,” American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, September 1981, pp. 662–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, Jack L., and Robert K. Davis, 1966, “Comparison of Methods for Recreation Evaluation,” in A. V. Kneese and S. C. Smith, eds., Water Research, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seller, Christine, John R. Stoll, and Jean-Paul Chavas, 1985, “Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques,” Land Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2, May 1985, pp. 156–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, Henri, 1961, Economic Forecasts and Policy, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, William J., 1981, “The Water Quality Ladder,” Appendix II in Robert Cameron Mitchell and Richard T. Carson, An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements, draft report. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, Robert D., 1976, “Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology,” American Economic Review, Vol. 66, No. 4, September 1976, pp. 587–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, V.K., Desvousges, W.H. (1986). Comparing Direct and Indirect Benefit Estimation Approaches. In: Measuring Water Quality Benefits. International Series in Economic Modeling, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4223-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4223-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8374-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4223-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics