Advertisement

Methodologic Issues in Investigations of Drug Abuse in Pregnancy

  • Alice O. Martin

Abstract

Studies of drug abuse in pregnancy pose no problems different from those in other types of medical investigations; however, they are characterized by a specific subset of analytic and interpretive problems. Foremost among these are vague hypotheses and study designs, difficulties in finding appropriate controls, small sample sizes, and loss of patients to follow-up. These problems will be discussed and guidelines presented on how to avoid them or to minimize their impact. These guidelines should be helpful to those planning and implementing research strategies, as well as to those who must apply the conclusions of the research of others in caring for their patients or formulating public policy.

Keywords

Null Hypothesis Confounding Variable METHODOLOGIC Issue Maternal Health Abnormal Outcome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailar, J. C. III, Louis, T. A., Lavori, P. W. and Polansky, M. (1984). Statistics in practice. Studies without internal controls. N. Engl. J. Med., 311, 156 - 62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chasnoff, I. J., Burns, W. J., Schnoll, S. H. and Burns, K. A. (1985). Cocaine use in pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med., 313, 666 - 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, A. E. and Ritchie, E. K. (1975). Questionnaires in Medicine - A Guide to their Design and Use. ( London: Oxford University Press )Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, S., Aquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W. and Weisberg, H. I. (1980). Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction. ( New York: John Wiley )CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freiman, J. A., Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H. and Kuebler, R. R. (1978). The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 301, 682 - 6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. ( New York: Wiley )Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siegal, S. (1956). Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. (New York: McGraw-Hill) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glantz, S. A. (1980). Biostatistics: how to detect, correct and prevent errors in the medical literature. Circulation, 61, 1 - 7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zar, J. H. (1974). Biostatistical Analysis. ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall )Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scheffe, H. (1959). The Analysis of Variance. ( New York: John Wiley )Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice O. Martin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations