Skip to main content

Possibility Theory: Searching for Normative Foundations

  • Chapter
Risk, Decision and Rationality

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLB,volume 9))

Abstract

Savage has studied qualitative probability relations in order to justify the axioms of numerical probability from purely ordinal arguments, for the purpose of modeling subjective uncertainty judgments. Such an attempt is made here for possibility measures, in a finite setting. Axioms are suggested which a binary relation “at least as possible as” must satisfy, so that the only numerical uncertainty measures compatible with such a relation are possibility measures. Moreover a general notion of belief structure is proposed in order to encompass both probability and possibility theories within the same qualitative setting. This is done by relaxing the qualitative “additivity” axiom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Finetti, B. (1937), ‘La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 7, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster A. P. (1967), ‘Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping’. Ann. Math. Stat., 38, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D. (1983), Modèles mathématiques de l’imprécis et de l’incertain, en vue d’applications aux techniques d’aide à la décision. Thèse d’Etat, Université de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D. (1984), ‘Steps to a theory of qualitative possibility’. Proc. 6th Int. Cong. of Cybernetics and Systems, Paris, Sept. 10–14, 1984, Thales Pub., Blackburn, UK, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D. (1986), ‘Belief structures, possibility measures and decomposable confidence measures on finite sets’. In: Théorie des Possibilités et Modèles Décisionnels, Rapport 242, LSI, Université P. Sabatier, Toulouse, 1986. Computers and A.I., 5, 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H (1982), ‘A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms’. Int. J. General Systems, 8, 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1982), ‘On several representations of an uncertain body of evidence’, in: Fuzzy Information and Decision Analysis (M.M. Gupta, E. Sanchez, Eds.), North- Holland, 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1985), Théorie des Possibilités. Applications à la Représentation des Connaissances en Informatique. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1986), ‘Recent models of uncertainty and imprecision as a basis for decision theory: towards less normative frameworks’. In: “Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments” (E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini, D. Woods, Eds.), NATO ASI Series, Vol. F 21, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fine, T. (1973), Theories of Probability, Academic Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giles, R. (1982), ‘Foundations for a theory of possibility’, in: Fuzzy Information and Decision Analysis (M. M. Gupta, E. Sanchez, Eds.), North-Holland, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goguen, J. (1967), ‘L-Fuzzy sets’. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 18, 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Good, I.J. (1962), ‘Subjective probability as the measure of a non-measurable set’. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences (E. Nagel, P. Suppes, A. Jarski, Eds.), Stanford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hugues, G. E., Cresswell, M. J. (1972), An introduction to modal logic, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kraft, C., Pratt, J., Seidenberg, A. (1959), ‘Intuitive probability on finite sets’. Ann. Math. Stat., 40, 2118–2126.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindley, D. V. (1982), ‘Scoring rules and the inevitability of probability’. Inter. Statist. Review, 50, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prade, H. (1985), ‘A computational approach to approximate and plausible reasoning with applications to expert system’. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 7, 260–283. Corrections in 7 (6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Savage, L. J. (1972), The foundations of statistics, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schweizer, B., Sklar, A. (1983), Probabilistic Metric Spaces, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shackle, G.L.S. (1961), Decision Order and Time in Human Affairs, Cambridge University Press, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shafer, G. (1976), A mathematical theory of evidence, Princeton Univ. Press, N.H.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sugeno, M. (1974), Theory of fuzzy integral and its applications. Ph. D. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suppes, P. (1974), ‘The measurement of belief’. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B, 36, 160–175.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zadeh, L.A. (1978), ‘Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility’, Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D. (1988). Possibility Theory: Searching for Normative Foundations. In: Munier, B.R. (eds) Risk, Decision and Rationality. Theory and Decision Library, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4019-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4019-2_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8283-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4019-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics