Skip to main content

Selecting the Best Unknown Mean from Normal Populations Having a Common Unknown Coefficient of Variation

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of selecting the population associated with the largest unknown mean from several normal populations having a common unknown coefficient of variation. Both subset selection and indifference zone approaches are studied. Based on the observed sample means and sample standard deviations, a subset selection rule is proposed. Some properties related to this selection rule are discussed. For the indifference zone approach, a two-stage elimination type selection rule is considered. If the experimenter has some prior knowledge about an upper bound on the unknown means, a modification is introduced to reduce the size of the selected subset at the first stage and also to reduce the sample size at the second stage. An example is provided which indicates that the saving in the total sample size is quite significant if this prior knowledge is taken into consideration in designing the selection rule. It is shown how to implement the above selection rules by using several existing tables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amemiya, T. (1973). ‘Regression analysis when the variance of the dependent variable is proportional to the square of its expectation’. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68, 928–934.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E. (1954). ‘A single sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances’, Ann. Math. Statist. 25, 16–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., Dunnett, C. W. and Sobel, M. (1954).‘A two-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with a common unknown variance’, Biometrika 41, 170–176.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz, E. J. and Dalai, S. R. (1975). ‘Allocation of observations in ranking and selection with unequal variances’, Sankhya B37, 28–78.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gleser, L. J. and Healy, J. D. (1976). ‘Estimating the mean of a normal distribution with known coefficient of variation’, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71, 977–981.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. (1956). ‘On a decision rule for a problem in ranking means’, Institute of Statistics Mimeo. Ser. No. 150, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. (1963). ‘Probability integrals of multivariate normal and multivariate t’,Ann. Math. Statist. 34, 792–828.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. (1965). ‘On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules’, Technometrics 7, 225–245.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. and Kim, W. C. (1984). ‘A two-stage elimination type procedure for selecting the largest of several normal means with a common unknown variance’, Design of Experiments: Ranking and Selection, (Eds. T. J. Santner and A. C. Tamhane), Marcel Dekker, New York, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. and Panchapakesan, S. (1979). Multiple Decision Procedures: Methodology of Selection and Ranking Populations, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S., Panchapakesan, S. and Sohn, J. K. (1985). ‘On the distribution of the studentized maximum of equally correlated normal random variables’, Commun. Statist.-Simula. Computa. 14 (1), 103–135.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. and Singh, A. K. (1983). ‘On subset selection procedures for the largest mean from normal populations having a common known coefficient of variation’, Technical Report #83–6, Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. and Sobel, M. (1957). ‘On a statistic which arises in selection and ranking problem’, Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 957–967.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. and Wong, W. Y. (1982). ‘Subset selection procedures for the means of normal populations with unequal variances: unequal sample sizes case’, Selecta Statistica Canadiana Vol. VI, 109–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, N. (1979). ‘Some comments on two-stage selection procedures’,Commun. Statist. A8, 671–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinott, Y. (1978). ‘On two-stage selection procedures and related probability inequalities’, Commun. Statist. A7, 799–811.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tamhane, A. C. (1978). ‘Ranking and selection problems for normal populations with common known coefficient of variation’, Sankhyā B39, 344–361.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, S.S., Liang, T. (1987). Selecting the Best Unknown Mean from Normal Populations Having a Common Unknown Coefficient of Variation. In: Bauer, P., Konecny, F., Wertz, W. (eds) Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3965-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3965-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8259-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3965-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics