Skip to main content

Comparison of Some Flood Frequency Distributions Using Empirical Data

  • Conference paper
Hydrologic Frequency Modeling

Abstract

The Gumbel, 3-parameter lognormal, Pearson type 3, log-Pearson type 3, and Boughton distributions as well as power transformation were evaluated and compared using 55 flood data sets from various sizes of drainage basins representing various parts of the U.S.A. No distribution was found to fit all flood data sets accurately. Based on empirical criteria, the log-Pearson type 3 distribution emerged as the best distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beard, L. R., 1974. ‘Flood flow frequency techniques.’ Technical Report, University of Texas at Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. A., 1968. ‘Uniform flood frequency estimating methods for federal agencies.’ Water Resources Research, Vol. 4, No.5, pp. 891–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, B. and Robitaille, R., 1977. ‘The use of Pearson type 3 and log Pearson type 3 distributions revisited.’ Water Resources Research, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, W. C., 1980. ‘A frequency distribution for annual floods.’ Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, W. C., 1983. ‘Fitting procedures for the log-Boughton distribution.’ Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R., 1964. ‘An analysis of transformation.’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. B26, pp. 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, S. J., Lettenmaier, D. P. and Bates, C. L., 1975. ‘Properties of the three-parameter lognormal distribution.’ Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chander, S., Spolia, S. K. and Kumar, A., 1978. ‘Flood frequency analysis by power transformation.’ Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the ASCE, Vol. 104, No. HY11, pp. 1495–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicioni, G., Giuliano, G. and Spaziani, F. M., 1979. ‘Best fitting of probability functions to a set of data for flood studies.’ Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Hydrology of Floods and Droughts, Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 304–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino, M. and Versace, P., 1984. ‘Two-component extreme value distribution for flood frequency analysis.’ Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 847–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan, G. V., Kuo, C. Y. and McCormick, T. C., 1985. ‘Methods of analyzing instream flows.’ Virginia Water Resources Research Center, Bulletin 148, Blacksburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. S. and Chong, She-King, 1983. ‘Flood frequency analysis for small watersheds in southern Illinois.’ Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangal, B. P. and Biswas, A. K., 1970. ‘The 3-parameter lognormal distribution and its applications in hydrology.’ Water Resources Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Council, 1981. ‘A uniform technique for determining flood flow frequencies.’ Bulletin 17-B, Hydrology Committee, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jain, D., Singh, V.P. (1987). Comparison of Some Flood Frequency Distributions Using Empirical Data. In: Singh, V.P. (eds) Hydrologic Frequency Modeling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3953-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3953-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8253-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3953-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics