Skip to main content

Public and Occupational Risk: The Double Standard

  • Chapter
  • 96 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Technology ((PHTE,volume 4))

Abstract

According to classical economic theory, the existence of some jobs which are more hazardous than others does not constitute a social inequity. After all, movie stuntmen, coal miners, and high-rise construction workers appear to be well compensated. This means, according to the theory, that workers are free to choose among occupations so as to balance their desire for income against their desire for safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • J. B. Revelle and Robin Bates, ‘OSHA — Still Not Enough’, Professional Safety (April 1977): 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), p. 9; hereafter cited as: RAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. K. Viscusi, Risk by Choice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983), pp. 114–115, 136; hereafter cited as: RBC. For an excellent treatment of the history of occupational risk and disease, see D.M. Berman, Death on the Job (London: Monthly Review Press, 1978); hereafter cited as: DOJ. See also the numerous case studies in L. B. Lave, ed., Quantitative Risk Assessment in Regulation (Washington, D.C.; Brookings Institution, 1982), chapters 3–8; hereafter cited as: QRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. W. Kates, Risk Assessment of Environmental Hazards (New York: Wiley, 1975), pp. 46–47; hereafter cited as: RA.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Starr and C. Whipple, ‘Risks of Risk Decision’, Science 208/4448 (6 June 1980): 1115–1117; hereafter cited as: Risk. Finally, see also B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs, ‘How Safe is Safe Enough?’ Policy Sciences 9, no. 2 (1978): 140–142, 148–150; hereafter cited as: Fischhoff, Safe.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. W. Jones-Lee, The Value of Life: An Economic Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 39; Eckholm, Jobs, pp. 33–34. See Starr, Philosophy, pp. 15 ff., and Viscusi RBC, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Egerton, ‘Appalachia’s Absentee Landlords’, The Progressive 45, no. 6 (June 1981): 43–45, and J. Gaventa, W. Horton, and the Appalachian Land Ownership Task Force, Land Ownership Patterns and Their Impacts on Appalachian Communities, vol. 1 (Washington, D.C.: Appalachian Regional Commission, 1981), pp. 25–59, 210–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971 ), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shrader-Frechette, K. (1988). Public and Occupational Risk: The Double Standard. In: Durbin, P.T. (eds) Technology and Contemporary Life. Philosophy and Technology, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3951-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3951-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2571-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3951-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics