Advertisement

Abstract

That psychoanalysis embraces both a psychology and a metapsychology has not always been recognised by its critics (e.g. Popper (1962), Eysenck (1953), (1985)), whose preoccupations have tended to centre on the scientific status of the former, rather than on the metascientific features of the latter. For this, Freud himself may be partly responsible. Thus Grünbaum contends, with some textual support, that Freud regarded his metapsychology as a “speculative superstructure”, and took his psychoanalytic corpus to stand or fall with his psychology — that is, his clinical theory or psychopathology, of which the theory of repression is the cornerstone. (Grünbaum (1984), p. 5)

Keywords

Scientific Explanation Conceptual Scheme Causal Process Scientific Realist Causal Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bridgman, P. W. (1927) The Logic of Modern Physics New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, Rudolf (1936—7) ‘Testability and Meaning’ Philosophy of Science 3 (4), 420–468 (1936); 4 (1), 1–40 (1937).Google Scholar
  3. Clark, A. (1980) Psychological Models and Neural Mechanisms Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Eysenck, H. J. (1953) Uses and Abuses of Psychology Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Pengu in Books.Google Scholar
  5. Eysenck, H. J. (1985) Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Eysenck, H. J. and Wilson, G. D. (1973) The Experimental Study of Freudian Theories London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  7. Farrell, B. A. (1981) The Standing of Psychoanalysis Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Feigl, Herbert (1967) The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’ — The Essay and a Postscript Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (First published in Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science II Feigl, Scriven, Maxwell (eds.): 370–497 (1958)).Google Scholar
  9. Fine, Reuben (1963) Freud: A Critical Re-Evaluation of His Theories London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, Seymour and Greenberg, Roger P. (1977) The Scientific Credibility of Freud’s Theories and Therapy New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Forge, John (1982) ‘Physical Explanation: With Reference to the Theories of Scientific Explanation of Hempel and Salmon’ in Robert McLaughlin (ed.) (1982), pp. 211–229.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, Sigmund (1895) Project for a Scientific Psychology in James Strachey (ed.) Standard Edition 1, 295–391.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, Sigmund (1900) The Interpretation of Dreams in James Strachey (ed.) Standard Edition 4–5.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, Sigmund (1901) The Psychopathology of Everyday Life in James Strachey (ed.) Standard Edition 6.Google Scholar
  15. Freud, Sigmund (1910) ‘The Origin and Development of Psycho-Analysis’ in John Rickman (ed.) (1937), pp. 3–44.Google Scholar
  16. Freud, Sigmund (1915a) ‘Instincts and Their Vicissitudes’ in Joan Riviere (ed.) (1959) 4, 60–83.Google Scholar
  17. Freud, Sigmund (1915b) ‘The Unconscious’ in Joan Riviere (ed.) (1959) 4, 98–136.Google Scholar
  18. Freud, Sigmund (1915c) ‘Repression’ in Joan Riviere (ed.) (1959) 4, 84–97.Google Scholar
  19. Grünbaum, Adolf (1984) The Foundations of Psychoanalysis — A Philosophical Critique Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hempel, Carl G. (1950) ‘Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning’ Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11, 41–63.Google Scholar
  21. Hempel, Carl G. (1951) ‘The Concept of Cognitive Significance: A Reconsideration’ Proc. Amer. Academy of the Arts and Sciences 80 (1), 61 — 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hempel, Carl G. (1954) ‘A Logical Appraisal of Operationism’ Scientific Monthly 79 (4), 215–220.Google Scholar
  23. Hempel, Carl G. (1965) ‘Aspects of Scientific Explanation’ in Hempel, Carl G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation New York: Free Press, pp. 331–496.Google Scholar
  24. Hempel, Carl G. and Oppenheim, Paul (1948) ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’ Philosophy of Science 15, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hook, Sidney (ed.) (1959) Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jammer, Max (1957) Concepts of Force Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Littman, R. A. and Rosen, E. (1951) ‘The Molar-Molecular Distinction’ in Marx (ed.) ( 1951 ), pp. 144–154.Google Scholar
  28. MacCorquodale, K. and Meehl, P. E. (1948). ‘On a Distinction Between Hypothetical Constructs and Intervening Variables’ Psychol. Review 55, 95–107. Abridged version reprinted in Marx, M. H. (ed.) (1951), pp. 103–111; page numbers cited refer to latter.Google Scholar
  29. McLaughlin, Robert (1967) Theoretical Entities and Philosophical DualismsA Critique of Instrumentalism Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  30. McLaughlin, Robert (ed.) (1982) What? Where? When? Why?Essays on Induction, Space and Time, Explanation Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  31. McLaughlin, Robert and Precians, Robert (1969) ‘Educational Psychology: Some Questions of Status’ in R. J. W. Selleck (ed.) Melbourne Studies in Education 1968–1969 Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press, pp. 29–71.Google Scholar
  32. Marx, M. H. (ed.) (1951) Psychological TheoryContemporary Readings New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Maxwell, Grover (1962) ‘The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities’ in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.) Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science III, 3–27, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Maze, J. R. (1954) ‘Do Intervening Variables Intervene?’ Psychol Review 61, 226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maze, J. R. (1983) The Meaning of Behaviour London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  36. Popper, K. R. (1962) Conjectures and Refutations New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Pribram, K. H. and Gill, M. M. (1976) Freud’s ‘Project’ Reassessed London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  38. Reichenbach, Hans (1956) The Direction of Time Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rickman, John (ed.) (1937) A General Selection from the Works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  40. Riviere, Joan (ed.) (1959) Sigmund Freud: Collected Papers ( 4 Vols.) New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Russell, Bertrand (1948) Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  42. Salmon, Wesley C. (1959) ‘Psychoanalytic Theory and Evidence’ in Hook (ed.) ( 1959 ), pp. 252–267.Google Scholar
  43. Salmon, Wesley C. (1970) ‘Statistical Explanation’ in R. G. Colodny (ed.) The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 173–231.Google Scholar
  44. Salmon, Wesley C. (1975) ‘Theoretical Explanation’ in Stephan Körner (ed.) Explanation Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 118–145.Google Scholar
  45. Salmon, Wesley C. (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Scriven, Michael (1962) ‘Explanations, Predictions and Laws’ in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.) Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science III, 170–230, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  47. Smart, J. J. C. (1963) Philosophy and Scientific Realism London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  48. Strachey, James (ed.) (1953–1974) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho- Analysis (abbreviated ‘SE’ in text).Google Scholar
  49. Sulloway, Frank J. (1979) Freud, Biologist of the Mind London: Burnett Books, in association with Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
  50. Tolman, E. C. (1936) ‘Operational Behaviorism and Current Trends in Psychology’ Proc. 25th Anniv. Celebr. Inaug. Grad. Stud. Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Van Fraassen, Bas C. (1982) ‘Rational Belief and the Common Cause Principle’ in Robert McLaughlin (ed.) (1982), pp. 193–209.Google Scholar
  52. Wollheim, Richard and Hopkins, James (eds.) (1982) Philosophical Essays on Freud Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert McLaughlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Macquarie UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations