Advertisement

Qualified Quantities: Towards an Arithmetic of Real Experience

  • S. O. Funtowicz
  • J. R. Ravetz
Part of the Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 5)

Abstract

This study has been motivated by two problems at widely separated places in the methodology of the natural sciences. One is the crisis in the philosophy of science, caused by the continuing failure of all programmes to identify a logical structure which could explain the previously succesful practice of natural science (Shapere 1986). The other is the failure of the traditional methods of laboratory science to encompass problems of risks and the environment in the policy process. Few people are aware of both problems and their possible connections. Here we will indicate their common root and, while not attempting a “solution” cast as some formalism, we will exhibit a practical device whereby quantitative statements can be made in a clear and effective way.

Keywords

Quantitative Information Magic Number Scientific Revolution Usable Knowledge Notational Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ayer, A. J.: 1936, Language, Truth and Logic, Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
  2. Capra, F.: 1975, The Tao of Physics, Wildwood House, London.Google Scholar
  3. Collingridge, D.: 1980, The Social Control of Technology, Francis Pinter, London.Google Scholar
  4. Crosland, N. P.: 1962, Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  5. Dalkey, N.: 1969, ‘An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. The Delphi Method,’ Futures 1 (5), 408–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas, M. and D. Wildarvski: 1982, Risk and Culture, University of California.Google Scholar
  7. Feyerabend, P. K.: 1975, Against Method, New Left Books, London.Google Scholar
  8. Fox, R.: 1974, ‘The Rise and Fall of Laplacian Physics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 4, 89–136.Google Scholar
  9. Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz: 1984, ‘Uncertainties and Ignorance in Policy Analysis’, Risk Analysis 4 (3) 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz: 1986, ‘Policy Related Research: A Notational Scheme for the Expression of Quantitative Technical Information’, J. Opt. Res. Soc., 37 (3), 1–5.Google Scholar
  11. Galilei, G.: 1632, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, University of California (1953), 53.Google Scholar
  12. Gödel, K.: 1931, On Formally Undecidable Propositions, Basic Books (1962), New York.Google Scholar
  13. Holton, G.: 1973, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Kepler to Einstein, Harvard U.P., 115–161.Google Scholar
  14. Jiang, J.: 1985, ‘Scientific Rationality, Formal or Informal’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci 36 (4), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keynes, J. M.: 1921, A Treatise on Probability, St. Martin’s Press (1952), New York.Google Scholar
  16. Kline, M.: 1972, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Oxford U.P., New York, 1206.Google Scholar
  17. Kline, M.: 1974, Why Johnny Can’t Add: The Failure of the New Math, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Kline, M.: 1980, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford U.P., New York.Google Scholar
  19. Kuhn, T. S.: 1961, ‘The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science’, Isis III, 161–193.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Lindbolm, C. E. and D. K. Cohen: 1979, Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving, Yale U.P., New Haven.Google Scholar
  22. Mackay, A. L.: 1977, The Harvest of a Quiet Eye, The Institute of Physics, Bristol and London.Google Scholar
  23. Mosteller, F.: 1977, ‘Assessing Unknown Numbers: Order of Magnitude Estimation’. In Statistics and Public Policy, Fairley, W. B. and F. Mosteller (eds.), Addison-Wesley, 163–184.Google Scholar
  24. Nelkin, D. (ed.): 1979, Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  25. Olby, R. C.: 1966, Origins of Mendelism, Constable, London, 116/182–185.Google Scholar
  26. Putnam, H.: 1981, ‘The Impact of Science on Modern Conceptions of Rationality’, Synthese 46, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ravetz, J. R.: 1971, Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems, Oxford U.P., 158. See also Chapter 10 for ‘Quality Control in Science’.Google Scholar
  28. Ruckelshaus, W. D.: 1984, ‘Risk in a Free Society’, Risk Analysis 4, 157–162.Google Scholar
  29. Savage, L. J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, J. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Shapere, D.: 1986, ‘External and Internal factors in the Development of Science’, Science and Technology Studies 4 (1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  31. Weinberg, A. M.: 1972, ‘Science and Trans-Science’, Minerva 10, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zukav, G.: 1979, Dancing Wu Li Masters: An overview of the new physics, Morrow, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. O. Funtowicz
    • 1
  • J. R. Ravetz
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations