Skip to main content

Foundations of Preference

  • Chapter
Theory and Decision

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 50))

Abstract

It is commonplace in rational decision theory to assume that an individual’s preferences are transitive. At the same time, behavioral decision theory informs us that people’s preferences are not always transitive and, in some situations, are likely to be intransitive. The viewpoint of the present paper, expressed previously in Cowan (1975) and Fishburn (1983), is that preference has very little to do with transitivity. Some preferences may be transitive, others intransitive, but in any event we have been unable to identify any logical, moral, or normative basis for transitivity apart from its obvious efficacy in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley. (Second edition, 1963 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Border, K. C.: 1984. ‘A Core Existence Theorem for Games Without Ordered Pre-ferences’. Econometrica 52, 1537–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S., Hurwicz, L., Richter, M. K., and Sonnenschein, H.F. (eds.): 1971. Preferences, Utility, and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W.: 1961. Prediction and Optimal Decision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W., and Ackoff, R.L.: 1946. Psychologistics (mimeographed). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, Marquis de: 1785. Essai sur 1’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendües á la pluralité des voix. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, T. A.: 1975. ‘Nonrationality in Decision Theory’. In Systems and Management Annual 1975 ( C. W. Churchman and R.W. Westner, eds.). New York: Petrocelli Charter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: 1959. Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1983. ‘Normative Theories of Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty’. Working paper, conference on Decision Making, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1984. ‘Dominance in SSB Utility Theory’. Journal of Economic Theory 34, 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A.: 1974. ‘An Equilibrium Existence Theorem Without Complete or Transitive Preferences’. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, K.O.: 1954. ‘Intransitivity, utility, and the aggregation of preference patterns’. Econometrica 22, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W., and Sonnenschein, H.: 1975. ‘Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences’. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2, 345–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A.: 1969. ‘Intransitivity of Preferences’. Psychological Review 76, 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cowan, T.A., Fishburn, P.C. (1988). Foundations of Preference. In: Eberlein, G.L., Berghel, H. (eds) Theory and Decision. Theory and Decision Library, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3895-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3895-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8230-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3895-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics