Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLB,volume 4))

Abstract

Preferences can be deduced by questioning a given population, which may be either reduced to a group of experts or considered as a set of inquired persons. Vagueness frequently appears in the asked questions or proposed criteria, and in the answers or characteristics given by the individuals. Fuzzy preferences are then necessary and, in some cases, they must lead to crisp conclusion. We study several means of evaluating the preferences in the case of fuzzy or imprecise answers to crisp questions (or criteria) or in the case of deliberately vague or subjective questions (or criteria). We deal with the problem of coming to the “best conclusion” with respect to the obtained results and we propose to use fuzzy relations and a method based on a measure of crispness of the classes of fuzzy opinions they determine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bezdek, J., B. Spillman, and R. Spillman (1979). Fuzzy relation spaces for group decision theory: an application. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 2, 5–14.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon, B. (1982). Decisions based on fuzzy information (in French). Proc. 19th Meeting on Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Liege, 1982 (Public. European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon, B. (1985). Questionnaires in a fuzzy setting. In J. Kacprzyk and R.R. Yager (eds.), Management Decision Support Systems Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Verlag TUV Rheinland, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, V. (1983). Group choice under fuzzy information. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 6, 25–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, J. (1984). Collective decision-making with fuzzy majority rule. Proc. of 6th International Congress of Cybernetics and Systems. Paris, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renyi, A. (1970). Probability Theory. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouchon, B. (1987). Preferences Deduced from Fuzzy Questions. In: Kacprzyk, J., Orlovski, S.A. (eds) Optimization Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Theory and Decision Library, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3869-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3869-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8220-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3869-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics