Skip to main content

Representability Conditions

  • Conference paper

Abstract

In his paper titled “The Convex Structure of Electrons” John Coleman [22] described how convexity entered the discussion of N-representability: “At one of those memorable mid-night sessions at Sanibel when we were discussing N-representability, Per-Olov sprang forward, took the chalk from my hand and demanded — ‘Have you considered the more general problem of ensemble representability?’”A non-pure state being a convex combination of pure, the collection of all reduced density matrices — those for both pure and non-pure states — forms a convex set. Since this mid-night meeting many have resorted to convex structure as a means of interpreting their results on N-representability. Certainly one of the most striking results along these lines is Coleman’s proof [23] that an arbitrary antisymmetrized geminal power wave function “covers” an extreme point in the convex set of reduced density matrices. With this theorem the AGP wave function achieved a special status in the theory. It is interesting that the only large families of extreme points that are known correspond either to Slater determinant states, AGP states or correspond to wave functions generated by taking Grassman products of AGP functions with Slater determinant functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. C. Garrod and J.K. Percus, J. Math. Phys. 5, 1956 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Kummer, J. Math. Phys. 8, 2063 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Rosina, B. Golli and R.M. Erdahl, ‘A Lower Bound To The Ground State Energy of A Boson System with Fermion Source’, included in these proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Garrod, M.V. Mihailovic and M. Rosina: J. Math. Phys. 16, 868 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.V. Mihailovic and M. Rosina, Nucl. Phys. A237, 221 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Rosina and C. Garrod, J. Computational Physics 18, 300

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.M. Erdahl, Reps. Math. Phys. 15, 147 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Erdahl and M. Rosina, Queen’s Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics 40, 36 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Kummer, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 12, 1033 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E.R. Davidson, J. Math. Phys. 10, 725 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E.R. Davidson and W.B. McRae, J. Math. Phys. 13, 1527 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R.M. Erdahl, ‘A convex set of second order inhomogeneous polynomials with application to quantum mechanical many-body theory’, Queen’s Univ. Press, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.M. Erdahl, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 13, 731 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.M. Erdahl and S.S. Ryskov, ‘A geometrical theory for some quadratic diophantine equations’, submitted to Can. J. of Math.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.M. Erdahl, ‘A cone of inhomogeneous second order polynomials, Queen’s Press (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.M. Mestechkin, ‘On The Diagonal N-Representability Problem’, included in these proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.M. Erdahl, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 13, 697 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R.M. Erdahl, C. Garrod, B. Golli and M. Rosina, J. Math. Phys. 20, 1366 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Garrod and J.M. Hannon, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 13, 125 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R.M. Erdahl and H. Grudzinski, Reps. Math. Phys. 14, 405 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H.W. Kuhn, Proc. Sym. Appl. Math. 10, 141 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.J. Coleman, ‘The Convex Structure of Electrons’, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 11, 907 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A.J. Coleman, ‘Necessary Conditions for N-Representability of Reduced Density Matrices’, J. Math. Phys. 13, 214 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R.M. Erdahl, ‘The Convex Structure of the Set of N-Representable Reduced 2-Matrices’, J. Math. Phys. 13, 1608 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erdahl, R. (1987). Representability Conditions. In: Erdahl, R., Smith, V.H. (eds) Density Matrices and Density Functionals. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3855-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3855-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8214-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3855-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics