Skip to main content

A New View of Scientific Rationality

  • Chapter
Rational Changes in Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 98))

Abstract

No one can doubt the extraordinary technological power that modern science has given to the western world. As Bertrand Russell put it:

Science, as a dominant factor in determining the beliefs of educated men, has existed for about 300 years; as a source of economic technique, for about 150 years. In this brief period it has proved itself an incredibly powerful revolutionary force.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bertrand Russell. The Impact of Science on Society. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1952, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moritz Schlick. Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, 1918 (p. 73 of the Enlglish translation, General Theory of Knowledge, by A. E. Blumberg. New York: Springer-Verlag Wien, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rudolf Carnap. Logical Foundations of Probability. London: Routlege and Kegan Paul, 1950, pp. 70 f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaakko Hintikka. Logic, Language-Games and Information. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973, Chapters. I and XI, and Knowledge and the Known. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1974, Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harold Jeffreys. Theory of Probability, second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1948, pp. 100 f.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl R. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959, Appendix *viii.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Ayer, in The Problem of Knowledge, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1956, said that there are certain unbridgeable logical gaps that we are simply to take ‘in our stride’ (p. 80). He did not say when a gap becomes too wide to be taken in our stride.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. F. Strawson, in Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen, 1952, said that evidence may conclusively establish a theory even though it does not entail it (p. 234). He did not spell out what conditions must be satisfied for this important relation of non-deductive proof to hold. On the contrary, he insisted that no such conditions can be specified (p. 248). He adopted a “sealed lips” policy: there exist valid non-deductive inferences but we cannot say what their nature is.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watkins, J. (1987). A New View of Scientific Rationality. In: Pitt, J.C., Pera, M. (eds) Rational Changes in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8181-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics