Abstract
In this chapter we discuss the simplest kind of set-theoretic structure that may be identified with, or serve as a logical reconstruction of an empirical theory. We call these structures ‘theory-elements’. Theory-elements consist of two parts — a purely formal, mathematical structure K which we call a ‘theory-core’ and a class of ‘intended applications’. Roughly, the formal core K is used to “say something” about the intended applications I. This distinction is introduced in Sec. II.1 and the remainder of the chapter is devoted to discussing different components of the theory-core (Secs. II.2–II.4), the intended applications (Sec. II.6) and the form of the claim made with the core about the intended applications (Secs. II.5 and II.7). Theory-elements are elementary empirical theories in two senses. First, they are the smallest set-theoretical entities that may have empirical claims associated with them. Second, more complex, non-elementary, “molecular” empirical theories are all built from theory-elements that are linked in specific ways (Ch. IV). Paradigm examples of theory-elements in our sense are “fragments” of theories associated with specific laws — for example, the theory of elastic forces, the classical theory of gravitational forces and the theory of van der Waals’ gases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Balzer, W., ‘Holismus und Theorienbeladenheit der Beobachtungssprache (ein Beispiel)’, Erkenntnis 10 (1976).
Balzer, W., ‘On a New Definition of Theoreticity’, Dialectica 39 (1985).
Balzer, W., ‘Theory and Measurement’, Erkenntnis 19 (1983).
Balzer, W. and Moulines, C. U., ‘On Theoreticity’, Synthese 44 (1980).
Balzer, W. and Mühlhölzer, F., ‘Klassische Stoßmechanik’, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1982).
Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U. and Sneed, J. D., ‘The Structure of Empirical Science: Local and Global’, Proceedings of the 7th international Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 1983, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
Diederich, W., Strukturalistische Rekonstruktionen, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1981.
Forge, J., ‘Theoretical Functions in Physical Science’, to appear in Erkenntnis.
Gähde, U., T-Theoretizität und Holismus, Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main-Bern, 1983.
Glymour, C, Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1980.
Heidelberger, M., ‘Über eine Methode der Bestimmung theoretischer Terme’, in W. Balzer and A. Kamlah, Aspekte der physikalischen Begrijfsbildung, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1979.
Kamlah, A., ‘An Improved Definition of “Theoretical in a Given Theory”’, Erkenntnis 10(1976).
McKinsey, J. C. C, Sugar, A. C. and Suppes, P. C, ‘Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Particle Mechanics’, Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis II (1953).
Moulines, C. U., ‘Links, Loops, and the Global Structure of Science’, Philosophia Naturalis 21 (1984).
Narlikar, V. V., ‘The Concept and Determination of Mass in Newtonian Mechanics’, Philosophical Magazine XXVII, No. 7 (1939).
Pearce, D., ‘Comments on a Criterion of Theoreticity’, Synthese 48 (1981).
Pendse, C. G., ‘A Note on the Definition and Determination of Mass in Newtonian Mechanics’, Philosophical Magazine XXIV, No. 7 (1937).
Pendse, C. G., ‘A Further Note on the Definition and Determination of Mass in Newtonian Mechanics’, Philosophical Magazine XXVII (1939).
Pendse, C. G., ‘On Mass and Force in Newtonian Mechanics’, Philosophical Magazine XXIX (1940).
Putnam, H., ‘What Theories Are Not’, in: Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1962.
Ramsey, F. P., ‘Theories’, in: The Foundations of Mathematics, Littlefield, Adams and Co., Patterson, New Jersey, 1960.
Simon, H. A., ‘Definable Terms and Primitives in Axiom Systems’, in: The Axiomatic Method, L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1959.
Simon, H. A. and Groen, G., ‘Ramsey Ehrninability and the Testability of Scientific Theories’, in H. A. Simon (ed.), Models of Discovery, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977.
Sneed, J. D., The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, revised edition, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.
Sneed, J. D., ‘Quantities as Theoretical with Respect to Qualities’, Epistemologica II (1979).
Sneed, J. D., ‘Invariance Principles and Theoretization’, in I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela (eds.), The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.
Stegmüller, W., Theorie und Erfahrung. Zweiter Teilband: Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer, Berlin, 1973. English translation by W. Wohlhüter, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer, New York, 1976.
Stegmüller, W., Theorie und Erfahrung: Dritter Teilband: Die Entwicklung des neuen Strukturalismus seit 1973, Springer, New York, 1986.
Swijtink, Z., ‘Eliminability in a Cardinal’, Studia Logica 35 (1976).
Tuomela, R., ‘On the Structuralist Approach to the Dynamics of Theories’, Synthese 39 (1978).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U., Sneed, J.D. (1987). Theory-Elements. In: An Architectonic for Science. Synthese Library, vol 186. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3765-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3765-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8176-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3765-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive