Abstract
Any modern reading of Goethe’s morphological writings must struggle with the author’s apparent satisfaction that his ‘morphology’ (Goethe coined the term) was both a descriptive science and a causal one. This unlikely attitude is made all the more difficult by Goethe’s suggestion that form — at least in the sense of ‘archetypal form’ — is itself causal. That ‘form,’ which is normally thought to be the effect of causal process, may somehow be identified with its origin, is counterintuitive to our normal habits of thought. It is not surprising therefore that the identity of ‘form’ and ‘law’ in Goethe’s writings is generally treated as an idealistic excess of Naturphilosophie which required no special effort to understand. Members of that school showed a tendency to reify ideas and had no misgivings about imposing such notions upon their observations. By the simple expedient of his inclusion in a homogeneous Naturphilosophie Goethe can be made unproblematic. It is an attractive solution, but an incorrect one.
A preliminary version of this paper, entitled ‘The Causal Dimension of Goethe’s Morphology’, was presented at the symposium ‘Goethe as a Scientist’ held at the University of California at Los Angeles and the California Institute of Technology, 12–13 April 1982, and initially published in the Journal of Social and Biological Structures 7 (1984) 345–356. The present version was read at a joint symposium sponsored by the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science and the Departments of Germanic Languages and History of Science at Harvard University, 3–4 December 1982.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arber, A.: The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1950.
Bockemühl, J.: in Goetheanistische Naturwissenschaft: 2: Botanik (ed. W. Schad), Verlag Freies Geistesleben, Stuttgart, 1982 (Originally published in Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 4 (1966). See also articles below.)
Bockemühl, J.: Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 10 (1969).
Bockemühl, J.: Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 7 (1967).
Bockemühl, J.: Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 1 (1964).
Cassirer, E.: The Problem of Knowledge, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1950.
Darwin, C.: On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London, 1859.
Geoffroy, E. St. Hilaire: Philosophie Anatomique, J. B. Bailliere, Paris, 1818.
Goethe, J. W. von: in ‘Goethe’s Botany,’ Chronica botanica 10 (1946), 63–126 (trans. A. Arber).
Goethe, J. W. von: Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 39, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München, 1963. For English translations see J. W. von Goethe, Goethe’s Botanical Writings (ed. and trans. Bertha Mueller), Univ. of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1952.
Goethe, J. W. von: Italian Journey, Schocken, New York, 1969.
Huxley, T. H.: Proc. Roy. Soc. 9 (1858), 391–457.
Mayr, E.: in Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14, Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston, 1974.
Nelson, G. and Platnick N.: Systematics and Biogeography, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1981.
Nordenskiold, E.: The History of Biology, New York, Tudor, 1928.
Oken, L.: ‘Über die Bedeutung der Schädelknochen’, Partial translation and summary, in T. H. Huxley, Lectures on the Elements of Comparative Anatomy, London, 1864.
Owen, R.: Report on the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton, Voorst, London, 1848.
Owen, R.: On the Anatomy of Vertebrates, Vol, 1, Longman, Green and Co., London, 1866.
Patterson, C.: ‘Problems in Phylogenetic Reconstruction’, in Systematics Association Special Volume No. 21, Academic Press, London, 1982, p. 21.
Remane, A.: Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik, Koeltz, Königstein-Taunus, 1971.
Russell, E. S.: Form and Function, John Murray, London, 1916.
Singer, C.: A History of Biology, Abelard-Schuman, New York, 1959.
Steiner, R.: Goethes Naturwissenschaftliche Schriften, Verlag Freies Geistesleben, Stuttgart, 1962. For an English translation, see R. Steiner, Goethe the Scientist, Anthroposophic Press, New York, 1950.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brady, R.H. (1987). Form and Cause in Goethe’s Morphology. In: Amrine, F., Zucker, F.J., Wheeler, H. (eds) Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 97. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3761-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3761-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2400-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3761-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive