Abstract
The systematic assessment of claims to knowledge is the central task of epistemology. According to naturalistic epistemologists, this task cannot be well performed unless proper attention is paid to the place of the knowing subject in nature. All philosophers who can appropriately be called ‘naturalistic epistemologists’ subscribe to two theses: (a) human beings, including their cognitive faculties, are entities in nature, interacting with other entities studied by the natural sciences; and (b) the results of natural scientific investigations of human beings, particularly of biology and empirical psychology, are relevant and probably crucial to the epistemological enterprise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, Peter: 1962. ‘The Circularity of a Self-Supporting Inductive Argument,’ Analysis 22, 138–141.
Black, Max: 1958. ‘Self-supporting Inductive Arguments,’ Journal of Philosophy 55, 718–725.
Brunswik, Egon: 1955. ‘“Ratiomorphic” Models of Perception and Thinking,’ Acta Psychologica 11, 108–109.
Descartes, René: 1951. Meditations. Tr. L. Lafleur. New York: Liberal Arts Press.
Glymour, Clark: 1980. Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Geuss, Raymond: 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen: 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Tr. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hegel, G. W. F.: 1892. The Logic of Hegel. Tr. W. Wallace. London: Oxford University Press.
Kant, Immanuel: 1950. Critique of Pure Reason. Tr. N. Kemp Smith. New York: Humanities Press.
Kornblith, Hilary (ed.): 1985. Naturalizing Epistemology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lorenz, Konrad: 1941. ‘Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie,’ Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 15, 94–125. English translation, ‘Kant’s Doctrine of the A Priori in the Light of Contemporary Biology,’ reprinted in H. C. Plotkin (ed.), Learning, Development, and Culture: Essays in Evolutionary Epistemology. Chichester and New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 121–143.
Lorenzen, Paul: 1968. Methodisches Denken. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Mannheim, Karl: 1936. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Nails, Debra: 1985. ‘Plato’s Naturalistic Epistemology,’ paper presented to Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, November 26, 1985.
Peirce, Charles S.: 1934. ‘The Fixation of Belief,’ Collected Papers, Vol. 5. Ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Plato: 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge; The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato. Tr. Francis M. Cornford. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Plato: 1945. The Republic of Plato. Tr. Francis M. Cornford. London: Oxford University Press.
Popper, Karl: 1972. Objective Knowledge. London: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1969. ‘Epistemology Naturalized.’ In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90. (Reprinted in Kornblith, 1985.)
Shimony, Abner: 1970. ‘Scientific Inference.’ In R. G. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 79 – 172.
Sosa, Ernest: 1985. ‘The Coherence of Virtue and the Virtue of Coherence: Justification in Epistemology,’ Synthese 64, 3–28.
Whitehead, Alfred N.: 1933. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shimony, A. (1987). Introduction. In: Shimony, A., Nails, D. (eds) Naturalistic Epistemology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 100. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3735-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3735-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8168-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3735-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive