Advertisement

Deductive Parameters and the Growth of Empty Categories

  • Taisuke Nishigauchi
  • Thomas Roeper
Part of the Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics book series (SITP, volume 4)

Abstract

The parametric model is extremely simple. An innate set of grammars presents a child with highly limited choices: two or three possibilities exist. A piece of input data shows unambiguously which is correct. How does the model connect to the reality of acquisition?

Keywords

Language Acquisition Lexical Item Binding Theory Empty Category Resumptive Pronoun 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, E.: 1982, ‘Purpose clauses and control’, in P. Jacobsen and G. Pullum, On the Nature of Syntactic Representation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Berwick, R.: 1982, Locality Principles and the Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge, MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
  3. Borer, H. and K. Wexler (this volume), ‘The maturation of syntax’.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of a Theory of Syntax, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N.: 1982, Some Concepts and Consequences, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cinque, G.: 1984, ‘A-bar bound vs. variable’, Universita di Venezia.Google Scholar
  9. Fabb, N.: 1984, Syntactic Affixation, MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
  10. Faraci, R.: 1974, Aspects of the Grammar of Infinitives and For-phrases, MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
  11. Finer, D and T. Roeper: to appear, ‘From cognition to thematic roles: The projection principle and the lexicon.’Google Scholar
  12. Goodluck, H.: 1981, ‘Children’s grammar of complement subject interpretation’, in S. Tavakolian, Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory Google Scholar
  13. Grimshaw, J.: 1981, ‘Form, function, and the language acquisition Device’, in The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition (1981), MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16(4), MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hyams, N.: 1986, Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacubowicz, C: 1984, ‘On markedness and binding principles’, NELS 14.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, C: 1985, Syntax and Thematics of Infinitival Adjuncts, University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
  18. Keyser, S. J. and T. Roeper: 1984, ‘On the middle and ergative constructions in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 15(3), MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Klein, S.: 1982, Syntactic Theory and the Developing Grammar, UCLA Dissertation.Google Scholar
  20. Koopman, H.: 1985, The Syntax of Verbs, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Lasnik, H. and S. Crain: to appear, ‘Review of “On the acquisition of pronominal reference” by L. Solan’, Lingua.Google Scholar
  22. Lust, B.: 1986, ‘Introduction to Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora’, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. May, R. and R. Matthews: to appear, Proceedings of Ontario Conference on Learn-ability, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Matthei, E.: 1981, ‘Children’s Interpretations of Sentences Containing Reciprocals’, in S. Tavakolian, Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Matthews, R.: to appear, ‘Introduction’, to R. May and R. Matthews.Google Scholar
  26. Nishigauchi, T.: 1984, ‘Control and the thematic domain’, Language 60(2).Google Scholar
  27. Nishigauchi, T., Y. Otsu, and M. Takahashi: 1984, ‘The acquisition of tough and related constructions in English’, Paper read at Kobe University.Google Scholar
  28. Otsu, Y.: 1981, Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children, MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
  29. Pesetsky, D.: 1982, Paths and Categories, MIT Dissertation.Google Scholar
  30. Phinney, M.: 1981, Syntactic Constraints and the Acquisition of Embedded Sentential Complements, University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
  31. Pinker, S.: 1984, Language Learnability and Language Development, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Randall, J.: 1982, Morphological Structure and Language Acquisition, University of Massachusetts dissertation (to appear), Garland.Google Scholar
  33. Randall, J.: 1985, Boston University talk on Retreat Strategies.Google Scholar
  34. Reinhardt, T.: 1986, ‘Center and periphery in the acquisition of grammar’, in Lust op. cit.Google Scholar
  35. Roeper, T.: 1978, ‘Linguistic universals and the acquisition of gerunds’, in H. Goodluck and L. Solan (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. Roeper, T.: 1982, ‘Linguistic universals and the acquisition of gerunds’, in L. Gleitman and E. Wanner, Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, CUP.Google Scholar
  37. Roeper, T. and J. R. Vergnaud: 1981, ‘On the government of infinitives’, University of Massachusetts ms.Google Scholar
  38. Roeper, T., M. Rooth, L. Mallis, and A. Akiyama: 1984, ‘The problem of empty categories and bound variables in language acquisition’, University of Massachusetts ms.Google Scholar
  39. Roeper, T.: to appear, ‘Theory, process, and mechanism in language acquisition’, Proceedings of Conference on Mechanisms in Language Acquisition, Carnegie-Mellon University (1985).Google Scholar
  40. Sells, P.: 1984, Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns, University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
  41. Slobin, D.: 1973, ‘Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar’, in D. Slobin and C. Ferguson, Studies in Child Language Development, Holt.Google Scholar
  42. Solan, L.: 1983, On the Acquisition of Pronominal Reference, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stowell, T.: Paper presented at Amherst Conference on Parameter setting.Google Scholar
  44. Takahashi, M.: 1984, The Acquisition of Embedded Clauses, M.A. thesis, Osaka University.Google Scholar
  45. Tavakolian, S.: 1981, ed. Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Vainikka, A.: 1985, ‘A theory of default rules’, University of Massachusetts ms.Google Scholar
  47. van Riemsdijk, H.: to appear, ‘Comments on Anaphoric Binding’, ed. by B. Lust.Google Scholar
  48. Wexler, K and P. Culicover: 1981, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wexler, K. and R. Manzini (this volume), ‘Parameters and Learnability’.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, E. S.: 1982, ‘The NP cycle’, Linguistic Inquiry 13(2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taisuke Nishigauchi
  • Thomas Roeper

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations