Skip to main content

Abstract

Disjunctive kriging is a general method, but the usual technique based upon Gaussian anamorphoses and Hermitian expansions become irrelevant in the case of discrete laws or, more generally, if the distribution possesses an atomic part. Isofactorial models with discrete laws, which are relevant in these cases, are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Isofactorial models originate from Quantum Mechanics, where they have been widely and systematically used since the twenties. See for instance [+]. In particular, Hermite polynomials appear as eigen functions in the case of the one dimensional harmonic oscillator. Among statisticians, this Hermitian model and some others are mentioned by Cramer [5] as early as 1945. Isofactorial models were also used in the field of Markov processes, see [6]. In data analysis, thev constituted the starting point of correspondence analysis, [7], [8]. In Geostatistics, they have been used since 1973, [9], [l]. Note well that in general the factors are not polynomials. But, at the request of the reviewer, I also mention the fact that reference [l0] discusses orthogonal polynomials.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matheron, G., “A Simple Substitute for Conditional Expectation the Disjunctive Kriging”, Proc. NATO ASI, “Advanced Geostatistics in the Mining Industry”, D. Reidel, p. 221–236. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matheron, G., “Modèles Isofactoriels et Changement de Support” CGMM, Fontainebleau, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matheron, G., “Remarques sur les Changements de Support”, CGMM Fontainebleau, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Landau, L.D., and Lifschitz, E.M., “Kvantovaïa Mekanika”, Mir, Moscow, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer, H., “Mathematical Methods of Statistics”, Princeton, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feller, W., “An introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications”, Vol. 1, J. Wiley and Sons, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benzecri, J.P., “L’Analyse des Données”, Dunod, Paris 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Naouri, “Analyse Fonctionnelle des Correspondances Continues”, Thesis, Paris, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matheron, G., “Le Krigeage Disjonctif”, CGMM, Fontainebleau, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beckmann, P., “Orthogonal Polynomials for Engineers and Physicists”, The Golem Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matheron, G. (1984). Isofactorial Models and Change of Support. In: Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A.G., Marechal, A. (eds) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8157-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3699-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics