Skip to main content

Improving the Estimation and Modelling of the Variogram

  • Chapter
Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization

Abstract

The efficacy of geostatistics depends, to a large extent, on the quality of the estimate obtained for the variogram. Several robust estimators of the variogram have been proposed recently. A close examination of many examples of non robust variograms suggests that this work has been going in the wrong direction. The variogram cloud approach used by Chauvet (5) seems a more fruitful starting point. Several ways of fitting variogram models using the variogram cloud will be discussed. The sensitivity of the ultimate Kriging weights and the kriging variance to small changes in the variogram model or in the location of sample points will also be studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfaro, N., 1979: “Etude de la robustesse des simulations de fonctions aléatoires”. Doc. Ing. Thesis, Ecole des Nines de Paris, 161 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, H., 1980: “Application de la géostatistique aux problèmes de l’estimation du charbon”. Doc. Ing. Thesis, Ecole des Nines de Paris, 18G0 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, M., 1982: “Commoner problems seen in variograms”. Internal note n° 774, C.G.N.N, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, N. and Delfiner, P., 1980: “Towards a more robust variogram: a case study on coal”. Internal note n° N-671, C.G.N.N., Fontainebleau.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chauvet, P., 1982: “The variogram cloud”. 17th APCON Symposium, Colorado School of Nines, Golden, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, C. F., 1984: “Use of the Jack-knife Method-to Estimate Auto-correlation Functions (or variograms)”. Lake Tahoe NATO A.S.I. Series, Reidel Publ. Corp., Dordrecht. p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cressie, N. and Hawkins, J., 1980: “Robust estimation of the variogram”. Int. J. of Math. Geol., 12, 2, pp. 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delfiner, P., 1976: “Linear estimation of non-stationary spatial phenomena”. In “Advanced Geostatistics in the Mining Industry”, N. Guarascio (Ed.), NATO ASI Series, Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 49–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Diamond, P. and Armstrong, N., 1983: “Robustness of Variograms and conditioning of kriging matrices”. Internal Note n° 804, CGNN, Fontainebleau (Submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fergin, P. D., Tweedie, R. L.* and Belyea, C., 1981: “Explicit; parameter estimation in hierarchical models using time-weighted linear combinations of observations”. (Submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henley, S., 1981: “Non-Parametric Geostatistics”, Applied Science Publ., Ltd., London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Huber, P. J., 1977: “Robust statistical procedures” CBNS- NSF, S.I.A.N., 56 p.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krige, D.G., Magri, E. J., 1982: “Studies of the effect of outliers and data transformation on variogram estimates for a base metal and a gold oreLody”. Int. J. of Math. Geol., 14, 6, pp. 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leedow, M. I. and Tweedie, R. L., 1981: “Weighted area techniques for the estimation of von Bertalanffy growth curve parameters”. (Submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matheron, G., 1965: “Les Variables régionalisées et leur Estimation”.Doc. Ing. Thesis, Masson, Paris, 306 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan, B. J. T. and Tweedie, R. L, 1982: “Stable parameter estimation using Laplace transforms in non-linear regression”. (Submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schuh, H. J., and Tweedie, R. L., 1979: “Parameter estimation using transform estimation in time-evolving models”. Math. Biosci., 45, pp. 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stark, T. H., and Fang, J. H., 1982: “The effect of drift on the experimental semi-variogram”. Int. J. of Math. Geol., 14, 4, pp. 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tukey, J. W., 1973: “Introduction to today’s data analysis”. Technical Report n° 40, Series P, Statistics Dept., Princeton University. (Presented at the Conference on Critical Engineering of Chemical and Physical Structural Information, Dartmouth College).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, M. (1984). Improving the Estimation and Modelling of the Variogram. In: Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A.G., Marechal, A. (eds) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8157-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3699-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics