Skip to main content

Factors Contributing to Efficiency in Natural Language Generation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 135))

Abstract

While differences in starting points, grammatical formalisms, and control structures make it intrinsically difficult to compare alternative designs for natural language generation systems, there are nevertheless many points of correspondence among them. To organize these points, we introduce an abstract reference model for the generation process. We then identify five specific factors with respect to that model that certain designs incorporate to make them more efficient computationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appelt, D. (1985) Planning English Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983) Situations and Attitudes. Massachusetts: MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. & Ingria, R. (1981) Controlled transformational sentence generation. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. (1983) Data-driven Indelible Planning of Discouse Generation Using Salience, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danlos, L. (1984) Conceptual and Linguistic Decisions in Generation. In: Proceedings of COLING-84. Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, A. (1974) Discourse Production,Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh. Published in 1978 by Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derr, M. & McKeown, K. (1984) Using Focus to Generate Complex and Simple Sentences. In: Proceedings of COLING-84. Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1969) Directed random generation of sentences, Communications of the ACN, 12, 40–46.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, N. (1975) Conceptual Generation. In: R. Schank (Ed.) Conceptual Information Processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckhardt, H.D. (1987) Generation of Sentences from a Syntactic Deep Structure with a Semantic Component. In: D. McDonald & L. Bole (Eds.) Papers in Language Generation. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. (1983) An Overview of the Penman Text Generation System,USC/ISI Technical Report RR-83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. (1984) Discourse Structures for Text Generation,USC/ISI Technical Report RR-84–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. & Matthiessen, C. (1985) Nigel: a Systemic Grammar for Text Generation. In: R. Freedle (Ed.) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: Selected Theoretical Papers of the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. & Moore, J. (1981) Computer generation of multi-paragraph English text. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 7, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. (1984) Description Directed Control: Its implications for natural language generation. In: N. Cercone (Ed.) Computational Linguistics. New York: Plenum Press. Reprinted in B. Grosz, K. Spark Jones, & B. Webber (Eds.) Readings in Natural Language Processing, Morgan Kaufman, California, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. & Pustejovsky, J.D. (1985) TAGs as a Grammatical Formalism for Generation. In: Proceedings of ACL-85. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, K. (1985) Text Generation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sondheimer, N. & Nebel, B. (1986) A Logical-form and Knowledge-base Design for Natural Language Generation. Proceedings of AAAI-86, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R. & Slocum, J. (1972) Generating English discourse from semantic networks. In: Communication of the ACM, 15, 891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McDonald, D.D., Vaughan, M.M., Pustejovsky, J.D. (1987). Factors Contributing to Efficiency in Natural Language Generation. In: Kempen, G. (eds) Natural Language Generation. NATO ASI Series, vol 135. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8131-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3645-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics