Abstract
In order to get a picture of Meinong as person and as philosopher, it is best to turn to the following writings: Philosophenbriefe edited by R. Kindinger, commemorative speeches written by Ernst Mally and Eduard Martinak, and Meinonggedenkschrift prepared and edited in Graz.1 From these writings a philosopher emerges who was careful, always in the process of revising himself, a generous, never-tiring teacher who was strict but respected everyone, who had a droll humor, and who was cheerful company in a small circle of friends. Examples which he used to illuminate a point and incidental remarks in his works show his subtle humor. Reading his mostly dry material, one is occasionally and unexpectedly amused; and through the lines one feels the warmth of the long gone person.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mally, Neue Österreichische Biographie, vol. VIII 1935, pp. 90–100; Martinak’s Trauerrede given before the Wiener Philosophische Gesellschaft, February 25, 1925; Meinonggedenkschrift, Graz, 1952.
M. Gederikschrift
Compare also Philosophenbriefe, p. 222.
Neue Ă–sterreichische Biographie, 1935.
Compare also Philosophenbriefe, p. 222.
Similar amazement is expressed by Karel Lambert in his book Meinong and the Principle of Independence, p. 1.
M’s Theory of Objects and Values. Compare M. on O. of H. O. Introduction.
Compare Em. Pres, Introduction, and Kalsi M. on O. of H. O.
Nachlass, Carton XII 2nd Epistem. Lect., Leaf 34ff concerning time.
Philosophenbriefe, Preface. Wilh. Frankl emphasizes Meinong’s empirical attitude which lasted through his whole life, in Meinonggedenkblatt
Psy. II, pp. 149, 224, 275f.
Ges. Ausg., Vol. VII, pp. 3ff.
Certain very important problems which are discussed in Deskr. Psy. and in Chisholm’s paper “Die Philosophie Franz Brentanos” cannot be dealt with here. They are too complex.
Ges. Ausg., vol. VII, pp. 55, 57, 58.
This, of course, refers to Husserl.
Each psychic act is accompanied by an idea of the same act. Psy. I, pp. 170, 179ff, 203, 218, etc.
Psy. I, pp. 40f.
Ibid.; compare Em. Pres., Introduction; Üb. em. Präs., Chapter 1.
Psy. I, pp. 48, 60f.
Psy. I, pp. 60f.
Psy. I, pp. 50, 128.
Ges. Ausg., vol. VII, p. (193), 189.
Wahrh. u. Evid, p. 68.
Ibid., p. 68.
Wahrh. u. Evid., pp. 64 (1889), 141ff.
Wahrh. u. Evid., pp. 137 (1915), 139, 148.
Deskr. Psy., p. 52.
Wahrh. u. Evid, p. 144f.
Brentano writes a short note in Deskr. Psy., p. 46: “Fear of Meinong’s relapse concerning evidence.”
Wahr. u.Evid., p.68.
Em. Pres., chapter 1.
Compare Psy. I, pp. 112, 116, 120; II, pp. 9, 124, 127, 139; Deskr. Psy., pp. 122,139.
“Über den Erkenntniswert ästhetischer Urteile,” Arch. f. d. Ges. psychol. V, p. 1905.
Philosophenbriefe, pp. 154f, 160.
Psy. II, pp. 89, 210.
Psy. I, pp. 141ff, 156ff, 161ff; Deskr. Psy., p. 22f.
E.g. Deskr. Psy., pp. 121, 124, 227.
Psy. II, p. 11.
E.g. Psy. II, p.149.
Haller, Die Philos. F. Brentanos.
Psy. II, p. 74.
p. 149f.
Psy. I, p. 86f.
Psy. I, p. 81.
Psy. II, p. 32.
Comp. Gey. Ausg., Erg. pp. 50, 170ff, Ges. Ausg. vol. VI, Mögl., pp. 190, 206, 107; vol. II “H. St. II”, pp. 132 -134.
Psy. II, pp. 199, 202, 203, 205.
Ibid., pp. 206, 211.
Ibid., p. 212.
Deskr. Psy., p. 62.
Compare Haller, Die Phil F. Brentanos.
Ges. Ausg., Erg., pp. 302f, 308; M. on O. of H. O., pp. 212,225f, 228f, 232.
M. on O. of H. O., pp. 41, 224, 230, Ges. Ausg. vol VI (Ann. II), p. 236, ft.note 4, vol I, “H. St. I,” p. 180f, “Empf.,” p. 135.
Psy. I, pp. 142f, 195.
Psy. I, pp. 234, 231.
Psy. I, pp. 236, 239.
Psy. I, p. 63.
Psy. I, p. 124,125.
Psy. II, pp. 33,124.
Psy. II, p. 90.
Compare M. on O. of H. O., pp. 25, 29, Ges. Ausg. vol. II, p. 403.
M. on O. of H.O., p.36ff.
Compare Psy. I, pp. 225, 210, 158, 162; on modus rectus and modus obliquus ibid. p. 134f, 243ff.
Compare Haller Die Phil F. Brentanos, p. 220.
Psy. III p. 235.
Psy. II, p. 238f.
Compare the example of the Centaur in Psy. II, p. 162.
Compare Goetschl, “Brentanos Analyse des Zeitbegriffes” in Die Phil F. Brentanos.
Midwest Studies in Philosophy, IV, p. 1981.
Chisholm, “B.’s Analysis,” p. 7.
Ges. Ausg., vol. II, “G.h.O.” p. 446.
Psy. II, pp. 241,270ff; Chisholm, “B.’s Analysis,” p. 12.
Compare chapter III above.
F.P. VII, pp. 30, 35.
F.P., p.82.
F.P., p.43f.
F.P., pp. 17, 43.
F.P., pp. 44, 39; Ess. on Ch., p. 342.
F.P., p.66.
F.P. VTI.
F.P., p.83.
F.P., p.44f.
F.P., p.4.
F.P., pp. 120,125.
F.P., p.120.
F.P., p.6.
F.P., pp. 5,7,118.
F.P., pp.5–7.
Compare M. on O. of H. O., p. 18.
F.P., pp. 9, 10.
F.P., pp. 9, 125.
F.P., p. 54.
F.P., p. 10.
F.P., p.44.
F.P., p.45.
F.P., pp. 86–88.
Compare Brentano chapter above.
Ess. on Ch., p. 322.
F.P., p. 88.
Ess. on Ch., p. 344.
Ess. on Ch., p. 344.
F.P., p.4.
F.P., p. 127f; Ess. on Ch., p. 457.
F.P., p.127ff.
Ess. on Ch, p. 358.
F.P., p. 128.
F.P., p. 51.
Compare perception chapter below.
F.P., p. 93.
Compare p. 92 below.
F.P., pp. 93,94,102.
For details of Meinong’s theory of perception, see perception chapter below. 4 F.P., pp. 101,102: perceptual principle and principle of perceptual evidence de re.
F.P., 112.
F.P., pp. 116, D6.
For the following and for greater detail, compare my paper “On Evidence According to Meinong and Chisholm” in Philosophical Topics, 1985.
Compare F.P, chapter 8.
F.P., p. 102; compare Th. of Kn.. 2nd ed., p. 112.
Th. of Kn.. 2nd ed., Chapter I.
F.P., p. 101.
F.P., p. 105.
F.P., p. 104.
See p. 86 below.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalsi, ML.S. (1987). Meinong, Brentano, Chisholm. In: Meinong’s Theory of Knowledge. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3641-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3641-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8129-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3641-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive