Abstract
The message uttered by a talker and the message the perceiver hears possess a common linguistic structure—phones, syllables, words, phrases, and sentences. However, the acoustic connection between the talker and listener is more easily described nonlinguistically, as an assortment of acoustic components. Research on the perceptual links in the speech chain has revealed the listener’s impressive accomplishment in recognizing the linguistic properties of such acoustic patterns, inasmuch as linguistic units are not conveyed by an isomorphic set of acoustic units. The distribution of acoustic ingredients in a speech signal is immediately revealing on this point: The junctures between the syllables, words, and even phrases that the perceiver hears do not correspond to the acoustic junctures, which are more numerous and more varied than their linguistic counterparts (Fant, 1962). In consequence, the paradigm problem for research in speech perception is to explain how the listener accomplishes the reduction of acoustic variation to linguistic significance.
This work was supported by grant NS-22096 from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, M.L., and Bear, D. (1974). Time to understand: A case study of word deafness with reference to the role of time in auditory comprehension. Brain, 97, 393–394.
Aslin, R.N., Pisoni, D.B., and Jusczyk, P.VV. (1984). Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In M.M. Haith and J.J. Campos (Eds.), Infancy and the biology of development. New York: Wiley.
Bailey, P.J., and Summerfield, Q. (1980). Information in speech: Observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 536–563.
Bailey, P.J., Summerfield, A.Q., and Dorman, M. (1977). On the identification of sine-wave analogues of certain speech sounds. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-51/52, 1–25.
Best, C.T., Morrongiello, B., and Robson, R. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 191–211.
Bondarko, L.V. (1969). The syllable structure of speech and distinctive features of phonemes. Phonetica, 20, 1–40.
Boring, E.G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.
Bregman, A.S. (1981) Asking the “what for” question in auditory perception. In M. Kubovy and J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Er’lbaum, Pp. 99–118.
Bregman, A.S., and Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequence of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 244–249.
Bregman, A.S., and Pinker, S. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 19–31.
Carney, A.E., Widin, G.E., and Viemeister, N.F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961–970.
Cherry, C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.
Cole, R.A., and Scott, B. (1972). Toward a theory of speech perception. Psychological Review, 81, 348–374.
Dannenbring, G.L. (1976). Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 99–114.
Fant, C.G.M. (1962). Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. Logos, 5, 3–17.
Fletcher, H. (1929). Speech and hearing. New York: Van Nostrand.
Fowler, C.A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3–28.
Ganong, VV.F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110–125.
Goldstein, M.V. (1974). Auditory agnosia for speech (pure word deafness); a historical review with current implications. Brain and Language, 1, 195–204.
Grunke, M.E., and Pisoni, D.B. (1982). Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 210–218.
Hockett, C.F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
Hunnicut, S. (1985). Intelligibility versus redundancy—conditions of dependency. Language and Speech, 28, 47–56.
Julesz, B., and Hirsh, I.J. (1972). Visual and auditory perception: An essay of comparison. In E.E. David and P.B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, Pp. 283–340.
Jusczyk, P.W. (1985). On characterizing the development of speech perception. In J. Mehler and R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming, buzzing confusion. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kewley-Port, D., and Luce, P.A. (1984). Time-varying features of initial stop consonants in auditory running spectra: A first report. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 353–360.
Kohler, W. (1910). Akustische Untersuchungen, II. Zeitschrift für Psychologie mit Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie und Charakter-künde, 58, 59–140.
Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
Lackner, J.R., and Goldstein, L.M. (1974). Primary auditory stream segregation of repeated consonant-vowel sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 1651–1652.
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.
Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley, Pp. 112–136.
Liberman, A. M. (1970). The grammars of speech and language. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 301–323.
Liberman, A.M., and Cooper, F.S. (1972). In search of the acoustic cues. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Papers in linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre. The Hague: Mouton, Pp. 329–338.
Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Hoffman, H.S., and Griffith, B.C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358–368.
Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Kinney, J.A., and Lane, H* (1961). The discrimination of relative onset time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 379–388.
Liberman, A.M., Isenberg, D., and Rakerd, B. (1981). Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 133–143.
Liberman, A.M., and Mattingly, KG, (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.
Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172–187.
Massaro, D.W. Categorical partition: A fuzzy logical model of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception. New York: Cambridge University Press. In press.
Mattingly, I.G., Liberman, A.M., Syrdal, A.K., and Halwes, T.G. (1971). Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 131–157.
Mehler, J., and Carey, P. (1967). Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 335–338.
Miller, G.A., Heise, G.A., and Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the text materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329–335.
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R.R., Liberman, A.M., Jenkins, J.J., and Fujimura, O. (1975) An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of ±rij and ±lij by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.
Modell, J.D., and Rich, G.J. (1915). A preliminary study of vowel qualities. American Journal of Psychology, 26, 453–456.
Nusbaum, H.C. (1983). Possible mechanisms of duplex perception: “chirp” identification versus dichotic fusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 94–101.
Pisoni, D.B. (1971). On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds. Supplement to Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-27.
Pisoni, D.B. (1975). Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception. Memory & Cognition, 3, 7–18.
Popper, R.D, (1972). Pair discrimination for a continuum of synthetic voiced stops with and without first and third formants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 205–219.
Rand, T.C. (1974). Dichotic release from masking for speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 678–680.
Remez, R.E., and Rubin, P.E. (1983). The stream of speech. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 63–66.
Remez, R.E., and Rubin, P.E. (1984). On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 429–440.
Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Katz, M., and Dodelson, S. (1985). On the influence of lexical status in phonetic perception. Paper presented at the 26th Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, Massachusetts.
Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Nygaard, L.C., and Howell, W.A.. Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press.
Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Pisoni, D.B., and Carrell, T.D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues.. Science, 212, 947–950.
Rubin, P.E., Turvey, M.T., and van Gelder, P. (1975). Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 394–398.
Samuel, A.G. (1981). The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 1124–1131.
Savin, H., and Bever, T.G. (1970). The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 33, 295–302.
Schubert, E.D. (1974). The role of auditory perception in language processing. In D.D. Duane and M.B. Rawson (Eds.), Reading, perception and language. Baltimore: York, Pp. 97–130.
Segui, J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech processing? In H. Bouma and D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Pp. 165–181.
Shattuck, S.R., and Klatt, D.H. (1976). The perceptual similarity of mirror-image acoustic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 470–474.
Stevens, K.N. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In E.E. David and P.B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp.51–66.
Stevens, K.N., and Blumstein, S.E. (1981). The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In P.D. Eimas and J.L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives in the study of speech. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Pp. 1–38.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1980). Speech perception. Language and Speech, 23, 45–66.
Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 77, 1074–1095.
Vicario, G.B. (1982). Some observations in the auditory field. In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Pp. 269–283.
von Noorden, L.P.A.S. (1971). Rhythmic fission as a function of tone rate. IPO Annual Progress Report, No. 6. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Walley, A.C., and Carrell, T.D. (1983). Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult’s and child’s perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1011–1022.
Whalen, D.H. (1984). Subcategorical mismatches slow phonetic identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 49–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Remez, R.E. (1987). Units of Organization and Analysis in the Perception of Speech. In: Schouten, M.E.H. (eds) The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. NATO ASI Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8123-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3629-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive