Skip to main content

Units of Organization and Analysis in the Perception of Speech

  • Chapter
The Psychophysics of Speech Perception

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 39))

Abstract

The message uttered by a talker and the message the perceiver hears possess a common linguistic structure—phones, syllables, words, phrases, and sentences. However, the acoustic connection between the talker and listener is more easily described nonlinguistically, as an assortment of acoustic components. Research on the perceptual links in the speech chain has revealed the listener’s impressive accomplishment in recognizing the linguistic properties of such acoustic patterns, inasmuch as linguistic units are not conveyed by an isomorphic set of acoustic units. The distribution of acoustic ingredients in a speech signal is immediately revealing on this point: The junctures between the syllables, words, and even phrases that the perceiver hears do not correspond to the acoustic junctures, which are more numerous and more varied than their linguistic counterparts (Fant, 1962). In consequence, the paradigm problem for research in speech perception is to explain how the listener accomplishes the reduction of acoustic variation to linguistic significance.

This work was supported by grant NS-22096 from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, M.L., and Bear, D. (1974). Time to understand: A case study of word deafness with reference to the role of time in auditory comprehension. Brain, 97, 393–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aslin, R.N., Pisoni, D.B., and Jusczyk, P.VV. (1984). Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In M.M. Haith and J.J. Campos (Eds.), Infancy and the biology of development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, P.J., and Summerfield, Q. (1980). Information in speech: Observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 536–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, P.J., Summerfield, A.Q., and Dorman, M. (1977). On the identification of sine-wave analogues of certain speech sounds. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-51/52, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Best, C.T., Morrongiello, B., and Robson, R. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 191–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bondarko, L.V. (1969). The syllable structure of speech and distinctive features of phonemes. Phonetica, 20, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boring, E.G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bregman, A.S. (1981) Asking the “what for” question in auditory perception. In M. Kubovy and J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Er’lbaum, Pp. 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bregman, A.S., and Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequence of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 244–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bregman, A.S., and Pinker, S. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 19–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carney, A.E., Widin, G.E., and Viemeister, N.F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961–970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherry, C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole, R.A., and Scott, B. (1972). Toward a theory of speech perception. Psychological Review, 81, 348–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dannenbring, G.L. (1976). Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 99–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fant, C.G.M. (1962). Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. Logos, 5, 3–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher, H. (1929). Speech and hearing. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fowler, C.A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ganong, VV.F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldstein, M.V. (1974). Auditory agnosia for speech (pure word deafness); a historical review with current implications. Brain and Language, 1, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grunke, M.E., and Pisoni, D.B. (1982). Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hockett, C.F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunnicut, S. (1985). Intelligibility versus redundancy—conditions of dependency. Language and Speech, 28, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Julesz, B., and Hirsh, I.J. (1972). Visual and auditory perception: An essay of comparison. In E.E. David and P.B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, Pp. 283–340.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jusczyk, P.W. (1985). On characterizing the development of speech perception. In J. Mehler and R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming, buzzing confusion. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kewley-Port, D., and Luce, P.A. (1984). Time-varying features of initial stop consonants in auditory running spectra: A first report. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohler, W. (1910). Akustische Untersuchungen, II. Zeitschrift für Psychologie mit Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie und Charakter-künde, 58, 59–140.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lackner, J.R., and Goldstein, L.M. (1974). Primary auditory stream segregation of repeated consonant-vowel sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 1651–1652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley, Pp. 112–136.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liberman, A. M. (1970). The grammars of speech and language. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liberman, A.M., and Cooper, F.S. (1972). In search of the acoustic cues. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Papers in linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre. The Hague: Mouton, Pp. 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Hoffman, H.S., and Griffith, B.C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Kinney, J.A., and Lane, H* (1961). The discrimination of relative onset time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 379–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liberman, A.M., Isenberg, D., and Rakerd, B. (1981). Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 133–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liberman, A.M., and Mattingly, KG, (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172–187.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Massaro, D.W. Categorical partition: A fuzzy logical model of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception. New York: Cambridge University Press. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mattingly, I.G., Liberman, A.M., Syrdal, A.K., and Halwes, T.G. (1971). Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mehler, J., and Carey, P. (1967). Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 335–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Miller, G.A., Heise, G.A., and Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the text materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R.R., Liberman, A.M., Jenkins, J.J., and Fujimura, O. (1975) An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of ±rij and ±lij by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Modell, J.D., and Rich, G.J. (1915). A preliminary study of vowel qualities. American Journal of Psychology, 26, 453–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nusbaum, H.C. (1983). Possible mechanisms of duplex perception: “chirp” identification versus dichotic fusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pisoni, D.B. (1971). On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds. Supplement to Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-27.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pisoni, D.B. (1975). Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception. Memory & Cognition, 3, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Popper, R.D, (1972). Pair discrimination for a continuum of synthetic voiced stops with and without first and third formants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rand, T.C. (1974). Dichotic release from masking for speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 678–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Remez, R.E., and Rubin, P.E. (1983). The stream of speech. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 63–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Remez, R.E., and Rubin, P.E. (1984). On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Katz, M., and Dodelson, S. (1985). On the influence of lexical status in phonetic perception. Paper presented at the 26th Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Nygaard, L.C., and Howell, W.A.. Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Remez, R.E., Rubin, P.E., Pisoni, D.B., and Carrell, T.D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues.. Science, 212, 947–950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rubin, P.E., Turvey, M.T., and van Gelder, P. (1975). Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Samuel, A.G. (1981). The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Savin, H., and Bever, T.G. (1970). The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 33, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schubert, E.D. (1974). The role of auditory perception in language processing. In D.D. Duane and M.B. Rawson (Eds.), Reading, perception and language. Baltimore: York, Pp. 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Segui, J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech processing? In H. Bouma and D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Pp. 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shattuck, S.R., and Klatt, D.H. (1976). The perceptual similarity of mirror-image acoustic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 470–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Stevens, K.N. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In E.E. David and P.B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp.51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Stevens, K.N., and Blumstein, S.E. (1981). The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In P.D. Eimas and J.L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives in the study of speech. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1980). Speech perception. Language and Speech, 23, 45–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 77, 1074–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vicario, G.B. (1982). Some observations in the auditory field. In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, Pp. 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  65. von Noorden, L.P.A.S. (1971). Rhythmic fission as a function of tone rate. IPO Annual Progress Report, No. 6. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Walley, A.C., and Carrell, T.D. (1983). Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult’s and child’s perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1011–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Whalen, D.H. (1984). Subcategorical mismatches slow phonetic identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Remez, R.E. (1987). Units of Organization and Analysis in the Perception of Speech. In: Schouten, M.E.H. (eds) The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. NATO ASI Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8123-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3629-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics