Skip to main content

Psychophysical Representation of Stop Consonant and Temporal Masking in Speech

  • Chapter
  • 196 Accesses

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 39))

Abstract

There is at present a strong demand from colleagues working in Automatic Speech Recognition for a “better” representation of the speech signal as input for their systems. After the adoption of the psychoacoustical Mel scale, some of them hope that the knowledge of a “truer” internal auditory representation of the speech signal could reduce the variability they have to handle, and/or make more salient some useful cues for phonetic identification.

Many thanks to Martine Boyer for having been a long-suffering subject and to Francois Lonchamp for his help in writing the English version of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumstein, S.E. (1986). On acoustic invariance in speech. In: J. Perkel and D. Klatt (Eds.) Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, 178–197. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fant, G. (1986). Features — Fiction and Facts. In: J.S. Perkell and D.H. Klatt (Eds.) Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, 480–492. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, B.C.J. and Glasberg, B.R. (1983). Masking patterns for synthetic vowels in simultaneous and forward masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, (3) 906–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pastore, R.E. (1981). Possible psychoacoustic factors in speech perception. In: P.D. Eimas and J.L. Miller (Eds.) Perspectives on the Study of Speech, 165–205. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schroeder, M.R. and Mehrgart, S. (1982). Auditory masking phenomena in the perception of speech. In: R. Carlson and B. Granström (Eds.) The Representation of Speech in the Peripheral Auditory System, 78– 88. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tyler, R.S. and Lindblom, B. (1982). Preliminary study of simultaneous-masking and pulsation-threshold patterns of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 220–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sorin, C. (1987). Psychophysical Representation of Stop Consonant and Temporal Masking in Speech. In: Schouten, M.E.H. (eds) The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. NATO ASI Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8123-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3629-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics