Skip to main content

Performance of the Electoral System in Recent Canadian and British Elections: Advancing the Case for Electoral Reform

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Studies in Economics and Econometrics ((ISEE,volume 17))

Abstract

Canada, India, New Zealand and of course the U.K. itself are among the relatively few democratic countries of the world which continue to employ the Single Member District (SMD), First Past the Post (FPTP) system of elections exclusively and in undiluted form. Once considered the model for the conduct of democratic elections, the inadequacies of the British method of elections have become increasingly evident in recent years, particularly in countries where questions of representation are complex ones and/or where the ability of established political institutions to survive periods of considerable stress may depend in part on the perceived legitimacy of the electoral system. While many countries have adapted both of the SMD or FPTP principles to their needs, or have abandoned the concepts altogether in favour of a system based on Proportional Representation (PR), Canada is one country which has throughout its history resisted any change in its national electoral system. This attachment to its British political traditions has been a costly one, as problems of representation have tended to compound many of the linguistic and regional stresses of the Canadian federation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Butler, D. and D. Stokes (1974). Political Change in Britain. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. and A. Sloman (1975). British Political Facts: 1900–1975. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., H. Penniman, and A. Ranney (1981). Democracy at the Polls. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, A.C. (1968). “The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada”,Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1, 55-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Task Force on Canadian Unity (1979). A Future Together. Ottawa: Dept. of Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Special Joint Comittee on Senate Reform (1984). Report on Senate Reform. Ottawa: Dept. of Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada (1985). Ottawa: Dept. of Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., J. Jenson, L. Leduc and J. Pammett (1979). Political choice in Canada. Toronto: MacGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., J. Jenson, L. Leduc and J. Pammett (1984). absent mandate: the Politics of Discontent in Canada. Toronto: Gage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, J.C. (1981). “Reflections on Reforming the Canadian Electoral System”, Canadian Public Administration, 14, 427 - 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, I. (1981). “Electoral Volatility in Britain Since 1945”, paper presented to the Workshop on Electoral Volatility, ECPR Joint Sessions, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, I. (1982). “Is Britains Two-Party System Really About to Crumble?”, paper presented to the anual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, I. (1983). “Dealignment and Realignment in the British Party System: the 1983 General Election”, paper presented to the anual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R., S. Flanagan, and P.A. Beck (eds.) (1984). Electoral Change in Industrial Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, K.M. (ed.)(1979). Multi-Party Britain. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S.S. (1975). Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform. London: Wigram.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S.S. (1980). The Changing British Party System 1945-1979. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, P. (ed.) (1982). Politics in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, P. (1982). “PR for Canada?”, in Fox P. (ed.), Politics: Canada, Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansard Society (1976). Report of the Hansard Society Comission on Electoral Reform. London: Hansard Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, W. (1979). Does Canada Need a New Electoral System?. Queen’s University, Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, W. (1981). “Power Requires Representation”, Policy Options, 4, 20 - 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakeman,E. (1974). How Democracies Vote. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, R. (1980). “Alternative Electoral Systems for Canada”, paper presented to the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, L. (1984). “Canada: the Politics of Stable Dealignment”, in: R. Dalton, S. Flanagan, and P.A. Beck (eds.), Electoral Cange in Industrial Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milnor, A J. (1969). Elections and Political Stability. Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penniman, H. (ed.) (1975). Britain at the Polls. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penniman, H. (ed.) (1977). Australia at the Polls. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penniman, H. (ed.) (1981). Britain at the Polls: 1979. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulzer, P.G. (1967). Political Representation and Elections in Britain. London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1982). The Territorial Dimension in Government. New Jersey: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarlvik, B., and I. CREWE (1983). Decade of Dealignment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (1981). Politics is for People. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leduc, L. (1987). Performance of the Electoral System in Recent Canadian and British Elections: Advancing the Case for Electoral Reform. In: Holler, M.J. (eds) The Logic of Multiparty Systems. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3607-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3607-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8114-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3607-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics