Abstract
As previously mentioned, two of the advantages of ultrasound are its short wavelength in tissue and the small acoustic impedence differences between various soft tissues. This means that reflections, standing waves, and refraction effects are minimized (especially compared to microwave applications)--facts which make the task of characterizing the SAR pattern in tissues considerably easier. In particular, this means that the shape of the intensity pattern often remains approximately the same in tissue as it is in a homogeneous liquid media (Fig. 1. This allows the primary calibration of a transducer to be performed in either a non-absorbing water media, and the correction for attenuation done later (a procedure similar to that used in radiation treatment planning), or in an absorbing media with an attenuation coeffecient similar to tissue. Of course, if significant bone or air surfaces are present these are more difficult to account for. Phantom work for ultrasound then primarily occurs in homogeneous liquid media for static phantoms, while dynamic phantoms can be useful in testing feedback control systems, and a variety of animal preparations are useful for in vivo testing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Shotton KC, Bacon DR, Quilliam RM: A pvdf hydrophone for operation in the range 0.5 MHz to 15 MHz, Ultrasonics, Vol 18, 123–126, 1980.
Fry WJ, Fry RB: Determination of absolute sound levels and acoustic absorption coefficients by thermocouple probes-theory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 26, 294–310, (1954a).
Fry WJ, Fry RB: Determination of absolute sound levels and acoustic absorption coefficients by thermcouple probes-experiment. J. Acoust, Soc. Am. 26, 311–317, (1954b).
Martin CJ, Law ANR: Design of thermistor probes for measurement of ultrasound intensity distributions, Ultrason, 85–90, 1983.
Martin CJ, Hynynen K, Watmough DJ: Measurement of Ultrasound Energy Density Distributions In Vivo, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. Vol. 10, 6, 701–708, 1984.
Bassen H, Allen S, Herman B, Kantor G: Robinson, R, Quality Assurance of RF and Ultrasound Cancer Hyperthermia Systems, Proceedings IEEE 7th Annual Conf. of the Eng. in Medicine & Biol. Soc., 346–351, 1985.
Herman B: Ultrasound Hyperthermia Test Phantom, to be submitted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.
Frizzell CA, Dunn F: Biophysics of Ultrasound in Therapuetic Heat & Cold, J. Lehmann (ed), Williamss and Wilkens, Baltimore, MD 1982.
Till P: Solid tissue model for the standardization of the echoop - hthalmograph 7200 MA (Kretztechnik). Doc. Ophthalmol., 41: 205–240. 1976.
Swindell W, Roemer RB, Clegg ST: Temperature distributions caused by dynamic scanning of focussed ultrasound transducers, in Proc. IEEE Ultrasound Symp., 750–753, 1982.
Madsen EL, Goodsitt MM, Zagzebski JA: Continuous waves generated by focused waves generated by focused radiation, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. Vol. 70, 1508–1517, 1981.
Edmunds PP: personal communication.
Baish JW: Convective Heat Transport Due to Blood Perfusion in Volumet-rically Heated Biological Tissue, Ph.D Thesis, Univ. of Penn., Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
Lagendijk JJW, Schelekens M, Schipper J, van der Linden PM: A Three-Dimensional Description of Heating Patterns in Vascularized Tissues during Hyperthermia Treatment, Phys. Med. Biol. 29: 495–507, 1984.
Holmes KR, Ryan W, Weinstein P, Chen MM: A fixation Technique for organs to be used as perfused tissue phantoms in bioheat transfer studies, Advances in Bioengineering, ASME WAM, 9–10, 1984.
Johnson C: A system and controller for ultrasonic hyperthermia tumor treatments, M.S. Thesis, University of Arizona, 1986.
Endrich B, Reinhold HA, Gross JF, Intaglietta M: Tissue perfusion inhomogeneity during early tumor growth in rats, J. Nat. Cancer Inst. Vol. 62, 387–395, 1979.
Lele P, Parker KJ: Temperature distributions in tissues during local hyperthermia by stationary or steered beams of unfocussed or focussed ultrasound, Brit. J. Cancer, Vol. 45, Suppl. V., 108–121, 1982.
Hynynen K, Roemer R, Moros E, Johnson C, Anhalt D: The Effect of Scanning Speed on Temperature and Equivalent Thermal Exposure Distributions During Ultrasound Hyperthermia In Vivo, IEEE Trans, Microwave Theory & Techniques, MTT-34, 552–559, 1986.
Hynynen K: Nonlinear absorption during scanned focused ultrasound hyperthermia, Proceedings IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 925–927, 1985.
Rundrat P, DeYoung D, Cetas T: Canine kidneys as thermal models for hyperthermia, 6th Annual NAHG Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 1986.
Diederich C: The implementation and evaluation of two thermal techniques for measuring local tissue perfusion, M.S. thesis, University of Arizona, 1986.
Hynynen K, Johnson C, Moros E, Roemer R, DeYoung D: Evaluation of physical parameter of ultrasound hyperthermia, in Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Eng. in Med. & Biol., 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roemer, R.B. (1987). Ultrasound Phantoms/Animals Experiments. In: Field, S.B., Franconi, C. (eds) Physics and Technology of Hyperthermia. NATO ASI Series, vol 127. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3597-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3597-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8109-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3597-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive