World, World-View, Lifeworld: Husserl and the Conceptual Relativists

  • David Carr
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 106)


Does it make sense to distinguish between world on the one hand and world-view or world-picture on the other? The following reflections are devoted to this question and its relation to the Husserlian concept of the lifeworld. Their purpose is to raise questions rather than provide answers or advance theses.


Conceptual Scheme Transcendental Philosophy Theoretical Activity Conscious Life Cartesian Meditation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. D. Carr ( Evanston: Nortwestern University Press, 1970 ) p. 382.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerd Brand, Die Lebenswelt, (Berlin, 1971), p. 17.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Crisis, p. 139.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations, trans. D. Cairns ( The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1960 ), p. 133.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., p. 151.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Crisis, p. 382.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cartesian Meditations, p. 77.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edmund Husserl, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. F. Kersten ( The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1983 ), p. 57.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Crisis, p. 71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibid., p. 130.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, tr. A.V. Miller (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1977 ), p. 53.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Heidegger, ‘Die Zeit des Weltbildes’ in Holzwege (Frankfurt, 1957), pp. 82–83.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibid., p. 80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Heidegger, ‘Das Ende der Philosophic und die Aufgabe des Denkens’, in Zur Sache des Denkens (Tubingen, 1969), p. 63.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., p. 80.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Die Zeit des Weltbildes’ (op. cit.), p. 96.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Foueault, Les mots et les choses (Paris, 1966), p. 13.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Foueault, L’archéologie du savoir (Paris, 1969), pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cf. J. Derrida, De la grammatologie (Paris, 1967) first part, esp. p. 72.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigations, tr. J.N. Findlay (New York: Humanities Press, 1970) vol. I: Prolegomena to Pure Logic.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heidegger, ‘Das Ende der Philosophic…’ (op. cit.), p. 80.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Davidson, ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’ on Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 41, 1974, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Carr
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of OttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations