Part of the American University Publications in Philosophy book series (MNPL, volume 29)


This essay explores and develops implications of certain features of contemporary philosophy, especially Deconstructionism, as well as features drawn from Kierkegaardian existentialism, for the discipline of philosophy of religion. In the field of philosophy of religion it will concentrate upon the concept of religious intuition and/or religious experience, inquiring as to the relationship between will/decision/conviction/faith and experience/awareness/intuition/cognition. While each of these terms may have a slightly different nuance, I shall not be concerned with such subtle distinctions, but concentrate, rather, upon a common thread that seems to run through one set of concepts and how it might be related to a common thread running through the alternative set of concepts. Thus the essay may be read on various levels or within various frames of reference.


Religious Experience Religious Commitment Contemporary Philosophy Religious Life Western Thought 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K. E. Kirk, The Vision Of God (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1935), p. 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. N. Flew, The Idea Of Perfection In Christian Theology (London: Oxford University Press, 1934), p. 141.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., p. 316.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quoted in Kirk, Ibid., p. 143.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Fox, Journal (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1940), p. 17.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Smith, Forgotten Truth (New York: Harper & Row, 1976), p. 87.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibid., p. 90.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibid., p. 112.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. S. Bixler, “Can Religion Become Empirical?” in J. S. Bixler, R. L. Calhoun, H. R. Niebuhr, The Nature Of Religious Experience (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1937.), p. 70.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. C. Macintosh, Theology As An Empirical Science (New York: Macmillan, 1940), p. IX.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibid., p. 91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. C. Macintosh, The Problem Of Religious Knowledge (New york: Harper & Brothers, 1940), p. 209.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Otto, The Idea Of The Holy (London: Oxford University Press, 1943), p. 117.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibid., p. 140.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., pp. 147–148.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ibid., p. 140.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ibid., p. 141.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. E. Scott, “Religious Truth,” in S. Skousgaard, Phenomenology And The Understanding Of Human Destiny (Washington: University Press Of America, 1981), p. 276.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ibid., p. 283.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. E. Smith, Experience And God (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), p. 13.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. E. Christensen, “How Is It That A (Concrete) Fact Can Speak For Itself? Process Phenomenology As An Alternative To Philosophical Empiricism.” This was a lecture presented at the University Of Iceland in 1984 sponsored by the University and Felag ahugamanna urn heimspeki, and to appear in their Newsletter; p. 25 in my preprint.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. E. Smith, Ibid., p. 36.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ibid., p. 42.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibid., p. 52.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibid., p. 64.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Ibid., pp. 117, 155.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    For a further discussion of this issue of starting points see H. A. Durfee, “Metaphilosophy In The Shadow Of Kierkegaard,” in J. H. Smith, Kierkegaard’s Truth: The Disclosure of The Self, Psychiatry And The Humanities, Vol. 5 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1941), p. 124.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1942), p. 68.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, p. 182.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. R. Niebuhr, Radical Monotheism And Western Culture (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), pp. 122–123.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    For a more extended analysis of this feature in contemporary philosophy of religion see H. A. Durfee, “Ultimate Meaning And Presuppositionless Philosophy,” Ultimate Reality And Meaning, 6 (1983) 244–262.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Brunner, The Divine-Human Encounter (Philadelphia, Westminster Press, 1943).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. Kohak, The Embers And The Stars (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1984), pp. 125–126.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. A. Erickson, “Methodological Neutrality In Pragmatism And Phenomenology,” in A-T. Tymieniecka, C. O. Schrag, Foundations Of Morality, Human Rights, And The Human Sciences, Analecta Husserliana, Vol. XV (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1983.), p. 161.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. Holmer, “A Fragment Of Thought About Feminism, Language And Church,” Reflection, 82 (1985) p. 16.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Derrida, Speech And Phenomena (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), P. 140.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ibid., p. 141.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ibid., p. 153.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ibid., p. 154.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. Derrida, Of Grammatology (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), p. 158.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R. Macksey, E. Donato, The Languages Of Criticism And The Sciences Of Man (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970), p. 156.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    J. Derrida, Of Grammatology, p. 49.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    H. N. Schneidau, “The Word Against The Word: Derrida On Textuality,” in R. Detweiler, Derrida And Biblical Studies (Chico: Scholars Press, 1982), p. 15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The American UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations