Abstract
Elsewhere [1] I have argued that the concept of self-reference has important applications in philosophy. These applications are a reason for trying to handle the concept as rigorously and formalistically as possible. In this connection, I have constructed asystem of logic CΓ [3] which can be shown to be consistent if the rule for ‘η’ is omitted, and within which at least some aspects of self-reference can be represented. I will now sketch this logic and show how it deals with the Russell Paradox and the Grelling Paradox.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
“Self-Reference in Philosophy.“ Mind,55 (1946) 64–73.
Elements of Combinatory Logic Yale University Press, 1974. See pp. 68–77.
“A Consistent Combinatory Logic with an Inverse to Equality.” Journal of Symbolic Logic,45 (1980) 529–543.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fitch, F.B. (1987). Formalized Self-Reference. In: Bartlett, S.J., Suber, P. (eds) Self-Reference. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3551-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3551-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8088-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3551-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive