Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Philosophy and Religion ((STPAR,volume 9))

  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

What sense can be made of hope as a feeling or emotion? Is hope a mood, an affect, a passion of the soul, a psychological state? Is it a generic disposition or attitude? Is it a state of mind, or a “climate of the mind”? These questions overlap where the subjective side of hope appears to be as much affective as conative or cognitional.

I cannot resist a feeling of hope. Franz Kafka, Letters to Felice

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Note

  1. J.P. Day, in “Hope,” American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1969): 89–102, employs these three observable elements as criteria.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broader bases are outlined by William P. Alston in “Emotion and Feeling” Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: Macmillian & Free Press, 1967) 2: 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thus concludes J.P. Day, while recognizing nonetheless that most philosophers, including Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, and Hume take hope to be an emotion.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, § 476.

    Google Scholar 

  5. There is a difference between holding that all emotions are specified by objects and holding that emotions are generally specified by objects. Anthony Kenny, in Action, Emotion, and Will (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, and New York: Humanities Press, 1963) holds the stronger position (pp. 60–62, 73);

    Google Scholar 

  6. putatively objectless emotions have latent objects, or are derivative. Kenny’s formulation, and his argument that connections between emotion and object are essential or non-contingent, have been challenged by J.R.S. Wilson in his Emotion and Object (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), Chs. IV and V. That emotions generally have or should have objects that specify them is held by J.P. Day in “Hope” and, in a different context, by Rollo May in Love and Will (New York: W.W. Norton, 1969), p. 91. George A. Schrader, in his “The Structure of Emotion,” takes a position close to Kenny’s but from a phenomenological standpoint. His essay appears in Invitation to Phenomenology, ed. James M. Edie (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1965), pp. 252–265.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Aquinas, Summa Theologiae I–II, q. 40, a. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freud, Collected Works 18: 12; Heidegger, Being and Time, Section 40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson, ed. Thomas H. Johnson (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1960), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Godfrey, J.J. (1987). Hope as Feeling. In: Godfrey, J.J. (eds) A Philosophy of Human Hope. Studies in Philosophy and Religion, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3499-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3499-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3354-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3499-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics