Skip to main content

Methodological Individualism and Institutional Individualism

  • Chapter
Rationality: The Critical View

Part of the book series: Nijhoff International Philosophy Series ((NIPS,volume 23))

Abstract

My aim in the present essay is to argue that individualism need not be psychologistic, and to defend institutionalistic individualism, which I consider to be Popper’s great contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Max Weber, spiBasic Concepts of Sociology, translated by H. P. Secher, New York, Citadel Press, 1962, para. I, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For further details see my ‘Conventions of Knowledge in Talmudic Law’ in Bernard S. Jackson (ed.), Studies in Jewish Legal History in Honor of David Daube. Jewish Chronicle Publ., London, 1974; also published as full issue of J. Jewish Studies, vol. 25, no. I (February 1974), pp. 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Gellner, ‘Time and Theory in Social Anthropology’, Mind, LXVII, April, 1958, 182–202; reprinted in Gellner, Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences, London 1973, pp. 88–106.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. The Strange Face of Evil’, The Listener, September 30, 1954, Vol. 52, pp. 522–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Pearce Williams, The Politics of Science in the French Revolution’, Paper Ten, Critical Problems in the History of Science, Ed. Marshall Clagett, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ‘Explanations in History’, Proceedings of the Aritotelian Society, Supp. vol. 30, 1956. Reprinted in Theories of History, ed. Patrick Gardiner, 1959. See also ‘Reply to Mr. Watkins’, printed at the very end of that volume.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ‘Ideal Types and Historical Explanation’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 9, 1952, p. 40, reprinted in Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, N.Y., 1953, p. 741, and in J. O’Neill, ed., Modes of Individualism and Collectivism, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watkins, ‘Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 7, 30, 1957, p. 112 n., reprinted in Theories of History, ed. Patrick Gardiner, 1959, pp. 509–10 n, and in O’Neill, op. cit., n. 7 above.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agassi, J. (1987). Methodological Individualism and Institutional Individualism. In: Agassi, J., Jarvie, I.C. (eds) Rationality: The Critical View. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3491-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3491-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3455-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3491-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics