Abstract
Rush implies that when a social scientist has an information problem, he keeps it to himself. This is, indeed, what tends to happen. Unlike other scientists, social science researchers make relatively little use of secondary bibliographical tools such as abstracts, indexes, and their computerized equivalents. They also make little use of the people who are responsible for organizing these sources, namely, librarians. Instead, they try their own methods of problem solving, which are not always effective. It is inevitable that with such an individualistic and often haphazard approach to information seeking there is much waste of effort and resources.
“It is sometimes suggested that the social sciences are not scientific enough; as far as information is concerned, they do not appear to be social enough.” (Rush, 1974)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adam, R. (1975). Meeting the information needs of social scientists. Information Scientist, Vol. 9, pp. 141–148.
Child, D. and Smithers, A. (1971). Some cognitive and affective factors in subject choice. Research in Education, Vol. 5, pp. 1–9.
Evans, S.M. and Line, M.B. (1973). A personalized service to academic researchers: the experimental information service in the social sciences at the University of Bath. Journal of Librarianship, Vol. 1, pp. 225–235.
Fay, B. and Moon, J.D. (1977). What would an adequate philosophy of social science look like? Philosophy and the social sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 209–227.
Garvey, W.D. (1975). The dynamic scientific-information user. In: Perspectives in Information Science, edited by A. Debons and W. J. Cameron. Leyden: Noordhoff, pp. 483–513.
Garvey: Communication among scientists and engineers, edited by C.E. Nelson and D.K. Pollock. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1970, pp. 61–84.
Hudson, L. (1963). Personality and scientific aptitude. Nature, Vol. 198, pp. 913–914.
Lengyel, P. (1974). Introductory remarks (to a symposium on communicating and diffusing social science). International Social Science Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 373–376.
Line, M.B. (1971). Or ask the librarian. New Society, Vol. 18, p. 888.
Line, M.B. (1976). Concluding summary. In: International Workshop of Secondary Service Producers. (Proceedings), edited by P.M. Ketley. Boston Spa: The British Library. (BLR & D Report No. 5289 ), pp. 52–54.
Roe, A . (1953). A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologists, and a comparison with biological and physical scientists. Psychological Monographs, Vol. 67, No. 352.
Rush, M. (1974). The information requirements of a university social scientist. In: Information services in university libraries, edited by F.H. Ayres and J. Hall. London: SCONUL (Standing Conference of National and University Libraries).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, Boston, London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adam, R. (1983). A “Social” Approach to Social Science Information. In: Debons, A., Larson, A.G. (eds) Information Science in Action: System Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3479-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3479-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8057-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3479-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive