Advertisement

Biaxial Testing Using Cruciform Specimens

  • C. J. Morrison

Abstract

Uniaxial test data for use in design of components and structures operating at high temperatures has been the sole means of predicting deformation and rupture. The majority of components and structures operating at high temperatures are subjected to biaxial or triaxial stress. Formulation of equations which enable calculation of deformations of such components to be made with more confidence has been the result of the investigations in the main by Johnson. Henderson and Khan (1962). From extensive work, primarily on tubular specimens, they confirmed , that creep under any arbitrary stress system can be derived from knowledge of the uniaacial test carried out at the same effective stress.

Keywords

Principal Stress Maximum Principal Stress Biaxial Tension Creep Rupture Multiaxial Stress State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, M. W. (1985) Private communication, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
  2. Hayhurst, D. R. (1972) Creep rupture under multiaxial states of stress. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 20, 381–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hayhurst, D. R. (1973) A biaxial-tension creep rupture testing machine. Journal of Strain Analysis, 8 (2), 119–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hayhurst, D. R. and Storakers, B. (1976) Creep rupture of the Andrade shear disc. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 349, 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayhurst, D. R., Morrison, C. J. and Leckie, F. A. (1975) The effect of stress concentrations on the creep rupture of tension panels. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 97 (3), 613–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson, J. and Dyson, B. (1982) Multiaxial creep testing. In Measurement of High Temperature Mechanical Properties, M. S. Loveday, M. Day and B. F. Dyson (Eds), Chap. 11, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, A. E., Henderson, J. and Mathur, V. D. (1956) Combined stress creep fracture of a commercial copper at 250°C. The Engineer, 202, 261–5.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, A. E., Henderson, J. and Khan, B. (1962) Complex-stress Creep, Relaxation and Fracture of Metallic Alloys, HMSO, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. Kelly, D. A. (1975) Creep cavitation failures in copper subject to biaxial stress systems at 250°C. Acta Metallurgica, 23, 1267–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Monch, E. and Galster, D. (1963) A method for producing a defined uniform biaxial tensile stress field. Brit. J. appl. Phys., 14, 810–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morrison, C. J. (1971) Development of a high temperature biaxial testing machine. Report 71–73, Leicester University Engineering Department.Google Scholar
  12. Penny, R. K., Ellison, E. G. and Webster, G. A. (1966) Specimen alignment and strain measurement in axial creep tests. ASTM Mat. Res. Stand.6, pp. 76–84.Google Scholar
  13. Sawert, W. and Voorhees, M. R. (1961) Influence of ductility on creep rupture under multi-axial stresses, ASME Pub. No 61-WA-233.Google Scholar
  14. Sdobyrev, V. P. (1958) Long term strength of alloy EI-437B under complex stresses. Izv. Akad, Nauk, SSSR, OTN, 4, 92–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier applied Science Publishers Ltd 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. Morrison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of LeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations