Skip to main content

On Constraining the Class of Transformational Languages

  • Chapter
The Formal Complexity of Natural Language

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 33))

  • 268 Accesses

Abstract

The need to add constraints to the theory of transformational grammar has been one (perhaps the) central goal of research by generative grammarians over the last decade. A number of important proposals have resulted from this research, most notably those due to Bresnan (1976), Chomsky (1973), Culicover and Wexler (1977), Emonds (1976), and Ross (1967). The first section of this paper is devoted to distinguishing between and considering the relative merits of two different views of the purpose of such constraints. The second and third sections attempt to add substance to my position by showing how progress towards the goals defended in the first section can be achieved.

A great many people have given me extremely valuable suggestions which affected the final form of this paper. I wish to especially thank Noam Chomsky and Dan Osherson both for getting me thinking about the issues in this paper in the way that I do, and for giving me very detailed and helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. I am also indebted to the following people for useful comments: Emmon Bach, Eve Clark, Herb Clark, David Evans, Vicki Fromkin, Ron Kaplan, Steve Lapointe, Julius Moravcsik, Dick Oehrle, Barbara Partee, Bill Paxton, Stan Peters, Tom Roeper, Justine Stillings, and Steve Weisler. Any shortcomings are of course my responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akmajian, A. ‘More Evidence for the NP Cycle,’ Linguistic Inquiry 6, 115–129, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, A. and Heny, F., An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., ‘Comparative Deletion and Constraints on Transformations,’ Linguistic Analysis 1, 25–74, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., ‘On the Form and Functioning of Transformations,’ Linguistic Inquiry 7, 3–40, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., ‘Variables in the Theory of Transformations,’ in Culicover, Wasow, and Akmajian (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C., The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from Five to Ten, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘Language and the Mind’, Psychology Today, 48–68, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co., Waltham, Mass., 1970a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., Preface to Introduction to Formal Grammars, M. Gross and A. Lentin, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., Language and Mind, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York, 1972a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar’, S. Peters, The Goals of Linguistic Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., 1972b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘Conditions on Transformations’, S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘On the Biological Basis of Language Capacities’, ms., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., ‘On Wh-Movement’, Culicover, Wasow, and Akmajian, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P., T. Wasow, A. Akmajian, Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P., K. Wexler, ‘Some Syntactic Implications of a Theory of Language Learnability’, Culicover, Wasow, and Akmajian (eds.), 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, E., A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., T. Bever, and M. Garrett, The Psychology of Language, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V., ‘Slips of the Tongue’, Scientific American, 229, 110–117, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Universals of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, S., J. Stillings, ‘Some Formal Properties of Core Grammars with the Hypothesis of Indeterminacy’, Dept. of Linguistics, U of Mass., Amherst, Mass., In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., ‘On the Limitations of Generative Grammar’, Proceedings of the Scandinavian Seminar on Philosophy of Language 1, 1–92, Filosofiska forening & Filosofiska Institutionen vid Uppsala Universitet, Upsala, vol. 1, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, J., J. Ullman, Formal Languages and their Relation to Automata, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R., Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English, MIT dissertation, Cambridge, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R., Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals, Mouton, The Hague, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kac, M., ‘Autonomous Linguistics and Psycholinguistics’, Linguistic Society of America summer meeting, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. ‘Mentalism in Linguistics’, Language 40, 124–137, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravif, D., ‘The Structure Preserving Constraint and the Universal Base Hypothesis’, Linguistics 116, 21–48, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.Y., ‘Classes of Languages and Linear Bounded Automata’, Information and Control 7, 207–223, 1964.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, S., ‘Recursiveness and Deletion’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 227–266, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H., R. Fiengo, ‘Complement Object Deletion’, Linguistic Inquiry 5, 535–572, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, J., ‘Transformational Grammars with Restricted Deletions’, ms., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D., T. Wasow, ‘Task-Specificity and Species-Specificity in the Study of Language: A Methodological Note’, Cognition 4, 202–214, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S., ‘On Restricting Deletion Transformations’, M. Gross, M. Halle, and M-P. Schiitzenberger, eds., The Formal Analysis of Natural Language, Mouton, The Hague, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S., R. Ritchie, ‘On Restricting the Base Component of Transformational Grammars’, Information and Control 18, 493–501, 1971.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S., R. Ritchie, ‘On the Generative Power of Transformational Grammars’, Information Sciences 6, 49–83, 1973a.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S., R. Ritchie, ‘Nonfiltering and Local-filtering Transformational Grammars’, J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes, eds., Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1973b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H., ‘Some Issues in the Theory of Grammar’, G. Harman, On Noam Chomsky (1974), Anchor Books, Garden City, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P., The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., Constraints on Variables in Syntax, MIT dissertation, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., ‘On Declarative Sentences’, R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co., Waltham, Mass., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, L, ‘Deletion and Logical Form’, MIT dissertation, Cambridge, Mass., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, R., Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T., Transformations and the Lexicon, P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, eds., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E., ‘Small Clauses in English’, J. Kimball, ed., Syntax and Semantics 4, Academic Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wasow, T. (1978). On Constraining the Class of Transformational Languages. In: Savitch, W.J., Bach, E., Marsh, W., Safran-Naveh, G. (eds) The Formal Complexity of Natural Language. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3401-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3401-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-047-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3401-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics