Advertisement

The Environmental Movement Comes to Town: A Case Study of an Urban Hazardous Waste Controversy

  • Richard P. Gale
Part of the Technology, Risk, and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 3)

Abstract

Contrary to earlier predictions (Downs 1972), the environmental movement has endured as a strong social movement, and now enjoys a relatively comfortable mid-life maturity. The consequences of this maturity are several. The movement can rely on complex and favorable legislation and a well-developed body of movement-supportive judicial decisions. The movement is less reliant on public adversary protest strategies than in earlier days. It can count on more established review procedures, such as environmental impact statements, to provide itself and the public time to review actions of interest. Maturity also means that not all movement issues will meet with a strong countermovement response. In addition, issues may broaden. For the environmental movement, earlier wilderness and rural area preservation issues have been joined by urban community issues, such as the one under study here. In this sense, then, the mature environmental movement has come to town.

Keywords

Environmental Protection Agency Social Movement Environmental Movement Open Meeting Park User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachman, W. A. ‘Interior’s Policy Decisions Tilted Toward Environment,’ Oil and Gas Journal, 1982, 76; 33–38.Google Scholar
  2. Byrd, Michelle. ‘Gas Works: Controversial from the Start,’ University of Washington Daily, May 10, c.1-3, 11 c. 1–4.Google Scholar
  3. City of Seattle. Executive Summary, Health Advisory Committee to Mayor Charles Royer, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. Downs, Anthony. ‘Up and Down with Ecology - the ‘Issue-Attention’ Cycle,’ Public Interest, 1972, 28; 38–50.Google Scholar
  5. Gale, Richard P. ‘Social Movements and the State: The Environmental Movement, Countermovement, and the Transformation of Government Agencies,’ Sociological Perspectives, 1986, 29, 202–240.Google Scholar
  6. Gates, Carolyn. ‘Planners Then Didn’t Know What We Know Now.’ (Letter to Editor), Seattle Times, June 18, 1984, A8 c.1.Google Scholar
  7. Hadley, Jane. ‘All of Gas Works Park is Polluted, Latest Tests Show,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 2,1984a, C 1 c. 3–6.Google Scholar
  8. Hadley, Jane. ‘State Wants 14 Sites Added to the Superfund Hazardous List,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 3,1984b, A6 c.1–4.Google Scholar
  9. Hadley, Jane. ‘What’s Known About the Dangerous Toxins at Gas Works Park,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 4,1984c, C 1 c. 3–6.Google Scholar
  10. Hadley, Jane. ‘Gas Works Park Decision Not Due Before Mid-June,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 5,1984d, C 1 c. 5–6.Google Scholar
  11. Hadley, Jane. ‘EPA Criticized for Rushing Cleanup Plans Past Public,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, June 12, 1984e, D2 c. 3–6.Google Scholar
  12. Hadley, Jane. ‘Gas Works Park May Reopen with Little Change,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, June 20, 1984f, D 1 c. 5–6.Google Scholar
  13. Hadley, Jane. ‘It’s Safe to Open Gas Works, say National Health Officials,’ Seattle Post Intelligencer, July 4,1984g, A3 c. 3–6.Google Scholar
  14. Hadley, Jane. ‘Gas Works Park May Open Soon with (Fairly) Clean Bill of Health,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, July 13, 1984h, C1 c. 1–4.Google Scholar
  15. Hadley, Jane. ‘State Asks EPA Help in Park Cleanup,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, July 14, 1984j, A1 c. 6, A7 c.1–2.Google Scholar
  16. Hedges, Fritz. Seattle Parks and Recreation Memorandum addressed to Jill Marsden, Chair, Health Advisory Committee, City of Seattle, June 25, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, Lansing. ‘Park’s Worst Chemicals Found in Children’s Play Area.’ Seattle Times, April 28,1984a, A1 c. 2-6, A13 c. 4–6.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, Lansing. ‘In 1962, Gas Works Park was a ‘Fantastic Deal’,’ Seattle Times, April 29, 1984b, A26 c.1–6.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, Lansing. ‘I-90 Clay May Save Gas Works Park,’ Seattle Times, June 13, 1984c, A1 c.1–4.Google Scholar
  20. Kalman, David. Letter from Kalman to Mr. Chuck Kleeberg, City of Seattle. Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, June 18, 1984.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, Marc L. and Richard P. Gale. ‘Professional and Public Natural Resource Management Arena: Forests and Marine Fisheries,’ Environment and Behavior, 1985, 17, 651–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nigg, Joanne M. and Beverly Ann Cuthbertson. ‘Pesticide Applications near Urban Areas: A “Crisis in Confidence” for Public Health Agencies,’ Journal of Health and Human Resources Administration, 1982, 4, 282–302.Google Scholar
  23. Richard, Michael. Seattle’s Gas Works Park. Seattle: Tilikum Place Printers, 1983.Google Scholar
  24. Schaefer, David. ‘Health Experts May Advise Royer to Reopen Park,’ Seattle Times, June 20, 1984, B1 c.1–2.Google Scholar
  25. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. ‘Superfund Help’ (editorial), May 3, 1984a, A10 c.1–2.Google Scholar
  26. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. ‘Superfund Works its Will in Seattle’ (editorial), May 10, 1984b, A10 c.1–3.Google Scholar
  27. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. ‘Gas Works Denizens Don’t Wait for Reopening,’ August 13, 1984c, D1 c.1–5.Google Scholar
  28. Seattle Times. ‘Gas Works May Open Soon, says Royer,’ July 10,1984a, C2 c. 1.Google Scholar
  29. Seattle Times. ‘Let’s Start Using Gas Works Again’ (editorial), July 29, 1984b, A18 c.1–2.Google Scholar
  30. Sumida, Midori. ‘July Opening of Gas Works Park Unlikely,’ Seattle Times, July 4, 1984, A1 c. 5–5.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, Duff. ‘City Asks UW to Test Soil at Gas Works,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer May 26,1984a, A3 c. 1–2.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, Duff. ‘Gas Works Park Could Open in July,’ Seattle Post-Intelligencer, June 27 1984b, A1 c. 5–6.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, Duff. ‘Royer says Gas Works Park Could Reopen by August 17,’ Seattle PostIntelligencer, July 28,1984c,D 1 c. 3–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard P. Gale

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations