Advertisement

The Environmentalist Movement and Grid/Group Analysis: A Modest Critique

  • Branden B. Johnson
Part of the Technology, Risk, and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 3)

Keywords

Social Movement Environmentalist Group Collective Good Resource Mobilization Hazard Identification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agar, Michael. Review of Risk and Culture by Douglas and Wildavsky. Anthropological Quarterly, April 1983, 56(2), 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alinsky, Saul D. Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Barry. ‘The Conventional Component in Knowledge and Cognition,’ in Nico Stehr and Volker Meja (eds.), Society and Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1984, 185– 208.Google Scholar
  4. Befu, Harumi. ‘Structural and Motivational Approaches to Social Exchange,’ in Gergen et al, 1980,197–214.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-David, Joseph. ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ in James F. Short, Jr. (ed.) The State of Sociology: Problems and Prospects. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1981, 40–59.Google Scholar
  6. Bender, Thomas, Community and Social Change in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, Jeffrey. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. Bloor, David. ‘Polyhedra and the Abominations of Leviticus: Cognitive Styles in Mathe-matics,’ in Douglas, 1982b, 191–218.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, Donald T. ‘Social Attitudes and Other Acquired Dispositions,’ in Sigmund Koch (ed.), Psychology: a Study of Science, Vol. 6. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964, 159–162.Google Scholar
  10. Cigler, Allan J. ‘From Protest Group to Interest Group: Coping with Internal Factionalism and External Threats.’ American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August 30-September 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. Cobb, Roger W. and Charles D. Elder. ‘Communication and Public Policy,’ in Nimmo and Sanders, 1981, 391–416.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, Gerald A. and Stephen B. Withey. ‘Perspectives on Risk Perceptions,’ Risk Analysis, June 1981, 1(2), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conway, M. Margaret. ‘Social Values and Mobilization to Political Participation.’ American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August 30-September 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, Terrence E. ‘Stands, Stances and Posturings: Levels of Sincerity in Political Posi¬tions.’ American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. August 30-September 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Cotgrove, Stephen. Catastrophe or Cornucopia; The Environment, Politics and the Future. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. Council on Environmental Quality. Public Opinion on Environmental Issues. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Printing Office, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. Cox, Kevin R. ‘Residential Mobility, Neighborhood Activism and Neighborhood Prob¬lems,’ Political Geography Quarterly, April 1983, 2 (2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devall, Bill. ‘The Deep Ecology Movement,’ Natural Resources Journal, April 1980, 20(2), 299–322.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas, Mary. ‘Cultural Bias,’ Royal Anthropological Institute, Occasional Paper 35, 1978. Reprinted in Mary Douglas, In the Active Voice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982a, 183–254.Google Scholar
  20. Douglas, Mary. ‘Introduction,’ in Gross and Rayner, 1985, xvii–xxvii.Google Scholar
  21. Douglas, Mary. Personal communication, May 26, 1984.Google Scholar
  22. Douglas, Mary (ed.). Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982b.Google Scholar
  23. Douglas, Mary and Aaron Wildavsky. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  24. Downey, Gary L. “Risk in Conflict: The American Conflict Over Nuclear Power,” Cultural Anthropology. November 1986, 1 (4), 388–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Downs, Anthony. ‘Up and Down With Ecology — The “Issue-Attention Cycle”,’ Public Interest, Summer 1972, 28, 38–50.Google Scholar
  26. Edelman, Murray. Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  27. Erikson, Kai T. Wayward Puritans. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Ermann, M. David and William H. Clements II. ‘The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and Its Campaign Against Marketing Infant Formula in the Third World,’ Social Problems, December 1984, 32 (2), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fallows, James. National Defense. New York: Random House, 1981.Google Scholar
  30. Fischhoff, Baruch, Paul Slovic, and Sarah Lichtenstein. ‘Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments About Risk,’ in Timothy O’Riordan and R. Kerry Turner (eds.), Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning, Vol. 3. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981, 161–202.Google Scholar
  31. Frohlich, Norman, Joe A. Oppenheimer, and Oran Young. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  32. Gergen, Kenneth J., Martin S. Greenberg, and Richard H. Willis (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum, 1980.Google Scholar
  33. Gerlach, Luther P. and Virginia H. Hine. Lifeway Leap; The Dynamics of Change in America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  34. Graber, Linda H. Wilderness as Sacred Space (Monograph 8 ). Washington, D.C.: Associa¬tion of American Geographers, 1976.Google Scholar
  35. Green, John C. and James L. Guth. ‘Who Is Right and Who Is Left? Varieties of Ideology Among Political Contributors.’ American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August 30-September 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  36. Gross, Jonathan L. and Steve Rayner. Measuring Culture: A Paradigm for the Analysis of Social Organization. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, I. M. Community Action versus Pollution: A Study of a Residents’ Group in a Welsh Urban Area (Social Science Monograph No. 2 ). Cardiff: University of Wales, 1976.Google Scholar
  38. Hampton, James. ‘Giving the Grid/Group Dimensions an Operational Definition,’ in Douglas, 1982b, 64–82.Google Scholar
  39. Hardin, Russell. Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, Stuart. ‘The Problem of Time for Policy Analysis.’ American Political Science Asso¬ciation, Washington, D.C., August 30-September 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  41. Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1980.Google Scholar
  42. Holdren, John P. ‘The Risk Assessors’ (review of Risk/Benefit Analysis and Risk and Culture), Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, June/July 1983, 39 (6), 33–38.Google Scholar
  43. Jackman, Mary R. and Robert W. Jackman. Class Awareness in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  44. Janeway, Elizabeth. Powers of the Weak. New York: Morrow, 1981.Google Scholar
  45. Jasanoff, Sheila. ‘Legitimating Private Sector Risk Assessment: A U.S.-European Com¬parison.’ Society for Risk Analysis, New York, August 2, 1983.Google Scholar
  46. Jenkins, J. Craig. ‘Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements,’ Annual Review of Sociology, 1983, 9, 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson, Branden B. Hazard Identification: Toward a Theory of the Social Construction of Risk. Manuscript, 1986.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, Branden B. ‘Life of the Land: An Environmental Action Group in Hawaii’ (B.A. thesis). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 1975.Google Scholar
  49. Johnson, Branden B. ‘Sierra Club Members in Western Pennsylvania.’ Manuscript, 1982.Google Scholar
  50. Kelly, George A. ‘“Les Gens de Lettres”: An Interpretation,’ in Douglas, 1982b, 120–131.Google Scholar
  51. Kennard, Byron. ‘Mixing Religion and Politics,’ Audubon, March 1984, 86 (2), 14–19.Google Scholar
  52. Kilbourne, Brock and James T. Richardson. ‘Psychotherapy and New Religions in a Pluralistic Society,’ American Psychologist, 1984, 39 (3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. ‘The Constructivist Programme in the Sociology of Science: Retreats or Advances?,’ Social Studies of Science, May 1982, 12 (2) 320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kriesberg, Louis (ed.). Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Vols. 1–5. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1978–1983.Google Scholar
  55. Lake, Laura M. ‘The Environmental Mandate: Activists and the Electorate,’ Political Science Quarterly, Summer 1983, 98 (2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lasswell, Harold D. ‘The Continuing Revision of Conceptual and Operational Maps,’ in Lasswell, Harold D., Daniel Lerner, and John D. Montgomery (eds.), Values and Development: Appraising Asian Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1976, 261–283.Google Scholar
  57. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Earl Raab. The Politics of Unreason: Right-Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.Google Scholar
  58. Lowe, Philip and Jane Goyder. Environmental Groups in Politics (Resource Management Series 6 ). London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
  59. Lowe, Philip and Michael Worboys. ‘Ecology and the End of Ideology,’ Antipode, July 1978, 10 (2), 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lowi, Theodore J. ‘A Jaundiced Public Eye,’ review of The Confidence Gap by Seymour M. Lipset and William Schneider, in New York Times Book Review, April 10, 1983, 7ff.Google Scholar
  61. McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory,’ American Journal of Sociology, May 1977, 82 (6), 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McCloskey, Donald N. ‘English Open Fields As Behavior Towards Risk,’ in Paul Uselding (ed.), Research in Economic History, Vol. 1. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1976, 124 - 170.Google Scholar
  63. McCombs, Maxwell E. ‘The Agenda-Setting Approach,’ in Nimmo and Sanders, 1981, 121–140.Google Scholar
  64. McKean, Margaret A. Environmental Protest and Citizen Politics in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  65. McPhee, John. Encounters with the Archdruid. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1971.Google Scholar
  66. Margolis, Howard. Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality. New York: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  67. Marshall, Susan E. ‘Ladies Against Women: Mobilization Dilemmas of Antifeminist Move¬ments,’ Social Problems, April 1985, 32 (4), 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mazur, Allan. The Dynamics of Technical Controversy. Washington, D.C.: Communications Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  69. Messina, Anthony M. ‘The Political Life-Cycle of British Protest Movements.’ American Political Science Association, New Orleans, August 29-September 1, 1985.Google Scholar
  70. Metlay, Daniel and George Hoberg, Jr. ‘Interest Groups and Activists: Their Motivations, Incentives, and Objectives in Risk Controversies.’ American Association for the Ad¬vancement of Science, New York, May 26, 1984.Google Scholar
  71. Mitchell, Robert C. ‘How “Soft,” “Deep,” or “Left”? Present Constituencies in the Environ¬mental Movement for Certain World Views,’ Natural Resources Journal, April 1980, 20 (2), 345–358.Google Scholar
  72. Mitchell, Robert C. ‘National Environmental Lobbies and the Apparent Illogic of Collec¬tive Action,’ in Clifford S. Russell (ed.), Collective Decision Making: Applications from Public Choice Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  73. Nelkin, Dorothy. ‘Blunders in the Business of Risk’ (review of Risk and Culture), Nature, August 19, 1982, 298, 775–776.Google Scholar
  74. Nimmo, Dan D. and Keith R. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Political Communication. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.Google Scholar
  75. Oliver, Pamela. ‘The Mobilization of Paid and Volunteer Activists in the Neighborhood Movement,’ in L. Kriesberg (ed.), 1983, Vol. 5, 133–170.Google Scholar
  76. Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  77. Olson, Mancur. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  78. Orr, Robert H. ‘The Additive and Interactive Effects of Powerlessness and Anomie in Predicting Opposition to Pollution Control,’ Rural Sociology, Winter 1974, 39 (4), 471–486.Google Scholar
  79. Ostrander, David. ‘One- and Two-Dimensional Models of the Distribution of Beliefs,’ in Douglas, 1982b, 14–30.Google Scholar
  80. Petersen, James C. and Gerald E. Markle. ‘Expansion of Conflict in Cancer Controversies,’ in L. Kriesberg (ed.), 1981, Vol. 4, 151–169.Google Scholar
  81. Pratt, Henry J. ‘Bureaucracy and Interest Group Behavior: A Study of Three National Organizations.’ American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 1972.Google Scholar
  82. Rayner, Steve. ‘Disagreeing About Risk: The Institutional Cultures of Risk Management and Planning for Future Generations,’ in Susan G. Hadden (ed.), Risk Analysis, Institu¬tions, and Public Policy. Port Washington, New York: Associated Faculty Press, 1984a, 150–178.Google Scholar
  83. Rayner, Steve. ‘The Perception of Time and Space in Egalitarian Sects: A Millenarian Cosmology,’ in Douglas, 1982b, 247–274.Google Scholar
  84. Rayner, Steve. ‘Radiation Hazards in Hospital: A Cultural Analysis of Occupational Risk Perception,’ Royal Anthropological Institute News, February 1984b, 60, 10–12.Google Scholar
  85. Rhodebeck, Laurie A. ‘Group Deprivation: An Alternative Model for Explaining Collective Political Action,’Micropolitics, 1981,1 (3), 239–267.Google Scholar
  86. Rootes, C. A. ‘On the Social Structural Sources of Political Conflict: An Approach from the Sociology of Knowledge,’ in L. Kriesberg (ed.), 1983, Vol. 5, 33–54.Google Scholar
  87. Rudwick, Martin. ‘Cognitive Styles in Geology,’ in Douglas, 1982b, 219–241.Google Scholar
  88. Salisbury, Robert H. ‘An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups,’ Midwest Journal of Political Science, February 1969, 13, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Salisbury, Robert H. ‘Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions,’ American Political Science Review, March 1984, 78 (1), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schein, Edgar H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.Google Scholar
  91. Schueler, Donald G. Incident at Eagle Ranch: Man and Predator in the American West. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  92. Shaiko, Ronald G. ‘Grass Roots Lobbying: Environmentalists as Constituents.’ American Political Science Association, New Orleans, August 29-September 1, 1985.Google Scholar
  93. Shrum, Wesley. ‘The Organizational Context of Public Interest Science,’ Technology in Society, 1984, 6 (4), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Simons, Herbert W. and Elizabeth W. Mechling. ‘The Rhetoric of Political Movements,’ in Nimmo and Sanders, 1981, 417–444.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, Ken K. ‘Social Comparison Processes and Dynamic Conservatism in Intergroup Relations,’ in L. L. Cummings and Barry M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 5. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1983, 199–233.Google Scholar
  96. Spector, Malcolm and John I. Kitsuse. Constructing Social Problems. Menlo Park, Cali¬fornia: Cummings, 1977.Google Scholar
  97. Stallings, Robert A. ‘Patterns of Belief in Social Movements: Clarifications from an Analysis of Environmental Groups,’ The Sociological Quarterly, Autumn 1973, 14, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thompson, Michael. ‘To Hell with the Turkeys! A Diatribe Directed at the Pernicious Trepidity of the Current Intellectual Debate on Risk.’ Center for Philosophy and Public Policy, Working Paper RC-5. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland, Mary 1983.Google Scholar
  99. Thompson, Michael. ‘The Problem of the Centre: An Autonomous Cosmology,’ 1982a; in Douglas, 1982b, 302–327.Google Scholar
  100. Thompson, Michael. ‘A Three-Dimensional Model,’ 1982b; in Douglas, 1982b, 31–63.Google Scholar
  101. Tillock, Harriet and Denton E. Morrison. ‘Group Size and Contributions to Collective Action: An Examination of Olson’s Theory Using Data from Zero Population Growth, Inc.,’ in L. Kriesberg (ed.), 1979, Vol. 2. 131–158.Google Scholar
  102. Walker, Jack L. ‘The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America,’ American Political Science Review, June 1983, 77 (2), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Walker, Jack L. ‘Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection,’ British Journal of Political Science, October 1977, 7 (4), 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Walker, Jack L. ‘Three Modes of Political Mobilization.’ American Political Science Asso¬ciation, New York, August 30-September 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  105. Whitten, N. E., Jr. and D. S. Whitten, ‘Social Strategies and Social Relationships,’ in B. J. Siegel (ed.), Annual Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, 1972.Google Scholar
  106. Wilson, James Q. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  107. Wolf, Eric R. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper and Row, 1969.Google Scholar
  108. Wuthnow, Robert, James D. Hunter, Albert Bergesen, and Edith Kurzweil. Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
  109. Wynne, Brian. ‘Discussion Paper on J. Conrad: Society and Risk Assessment — An Attempt at Interpretation,’ in Jobst Conrad (ed.), Society, Technology and Risk Assess¬ment. London: Academic Press, 1980a, 281–286.Google Scholar
  110. Wynne, Brian. ‘Technology, Risk and Participation: On the Social Treatment of Uncer¬tainty,’ in Jobst Conrad (ed.), Society, Technology and Risk Assessment. London: Academic Press, 1980b, 173–208.Google Scholar
  111. Yergin, Daniel. Shattered Peace; The Origins of the Cold War and the National Security State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977.Google Scholar
  112. Zald, Mayer N. and John D. McCarthy. ‘Social Movement Industries: Competition and Cooperation Among Movement Organizations,’ in L. Kriesberg (ed.), 1980, Vol. 3, 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Branden B. Johnson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations