Advertisement

Risk Perception in Community Context: A Case Study

  • Janet M. Fitchen
  • Jenifer S. Heath
  • June Fessenden-Raden
Part of the Technology, Risk, and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 3)

Abstract

This chapter takes a holistic, contextual, and community-based approach to understanding social construction of risks. Our research utilizes community settings as arenas in which actual localized risks are perceived and addressed.1 The case study approach enables us to examine the dynamics of risk perception, concentrating on overt expressions and reactions over time, rather than on individual perceptions at a single point in time This naturalistic in situ approach reveals factors influencing risk perception that may be obscured in studies in which individual respondents are asked to rank hypothetical risks without regard for the complicating factors and actual consequences that exist in ongoing community life see, for contrast, the psychometric research of Slovic et al. 1980, 1984.

Keywords

Health Risk Environmental Protection Agency Risk Perception Local Official Community Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berry, David et al. Costs and Benefits of Removing Volatile Organic Compounds from Drinking Water. Preliminary Draft, 9/28/84. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Associates, Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, David and J. Andrew Stoeckle. ‘Decentralization of Risk Management: The Case of Drinking Water.’ Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Associates, Inc., 1985.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, H. S., D. R. Bishop, and C. A. Rowan. ‘The Role of Skin Absorption as a Route of Exposure for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCS) in Drinking Water,’ in, American Journal of Public Health, 1984, 74, 479–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning, E. ‘Trichloroethylene,’ in Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents. Elsevier Press, 1965, 189–212.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas, Mary. Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, Mary and Aaron Wildavsky. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. Edelstein, Michael R. The Social and Psychological Impacts of Groundwater Contamination in the Legler Section of Jackson, New Jersey, 1982. (unpublished ms.)Google Scholar
  8. Fitchen, Janet M. Forthcoming, ‘The Importance of Community Context in Effective Risk Management.’ Paper delivered at Society for Risk Analysis, Washington, D.C., October 1985. To be publishing in Proceedings.Google Scholar
  9. Fowlkes, Martha R. and Patricia Y. Miller Love Canal: The Social Construction of Disaster. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Goyer, Robert A. ‘Potential Health Effects from Groundwater Pollution,’ EPA Journal, 1984, 10 (6), 22–23.Google Scholar
  11. Hus, Francis L. K. ‘American Core Values and National Character,’ in Hsu (ed.), Psychological Anthropology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman, 1973, 241–262.Google Scholar
  12. National Academy of Sciences. Drinking Water and Health, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. National Academy of Sciences. Drinking Water and Health, Vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. National Cancer Institute. ‘Carcinogenesis Bioassay of Trichloroethylene.’ National Cancer Institute Carcinogenesis Technical Report Series, Number 2, 1976. [H. E. W. Publication number (N. I. H.) 76–802.]Google Scholar
  15. Rayner, Steve. ‘A Cultural Analysis of Occupational Risk Perception,’ Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter, 1984, 60, 10–12.Google Scholar
  16. Rayner, Steve. ‘Predicting Social Acceptance of Future Technologies: Advanced Concepts for Nuclear Reactors,’ Lecture presented at Cornell University, 2/7/1985.Google Scholar
  17. Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sara Lichtenstein ‘Rating the Risks,’ Environment, 1979, 21, 14–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sara Lichtenstein ‘Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk,’ in R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers, Jr. (eds.), Social Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York: Plenum Press, 1980, 181–214.Google Scholar
  19. Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sara Lichtenstein ‘Behavioral Decision Theory Perspectives on Risk and Safety’, Acta Psychologica, 1984, 56, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolfenstein, Martha. Disaster: A Psychological Essay. Glencoe: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet M. Fitchen
  • Jenifer S. Heath
  • June Fessenden-Raden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations