Skip to main content

Labor History and Labor Economics

  • Chapter
The Future of Economic History

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 9))

Abstract

What would a modern economist want to learn from American labor history? Economists interested in long-term growth and development might want to begin with the material conditions of the laboring classes, the growth of worker real incomes and living standards in relation to general economic progress. This sort of interest would not stop at the consumption of goods as conventionally defined, but would include other components of economic welfare, such as long-term trends in conditions of work: hours, safety, job security, workpace, and perhaps more elusive aspects of “job quality.” For the analytically minded economist of today, however, learning these bare facts would only be the beginning. The modern economist would then want to know something about what kind of market or nonmarket mechanisms generated these results. Have worker preferences changed, for example, regarding the trade-offs among money income, job security, shorter hours, and better working conditions? How has the labor market priced these job attributes at different historical periods? If some improvements in the conditions of workingmen’s lives have been purchased only at an economic cost, what was this cost, and what were the implications for national economic progress?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, Katharine, and James L. Medoff. 1984. Length of service and layoffs in union and nonunion work groups. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38:87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, Katharine, and James L. Medoff. 1985. Length of service and promotion in union and nonunion work groups. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38:408–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Jr., Donald R. The standard of living during American industrialization: Evidence from the Brandywine region, 1800–1860. Journal of Economic History 42:903–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., and Robert Higgs. 1982. Contractual mix in Southern agriculture since the Civil War. Journal of Economic History 42:327–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, Brian. 1983. On competing technologies and historical small events. Stanford University (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, Ross. 1978. Labor Economics: A Guide to Information Sources. Detroit: Gale Research Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Martin Neil. 1983. The labor market in the 1930s. In James Tobin (ed.), Macroeconomics: Prices and Quantities. Washington: Brookings. Pp. 21–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Irving. 1960. The Lean Years: A History of the American Worker, 1920–1933. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Francine. 1980. Immigration and labor earnings in early twentieth-century America. Research in Population Economics 2:21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, Eileen. 1985. Regulating industrial homework: The triumph of “Sacred Motherhood.”Journal of American History 71:745–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Sam. 1985. The production process in a competitive economy. American Economic Review 75:16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, Stuart D. 1976. American Welfare Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, David. 1960. Steelworkers in America: The Nonunion Era. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, David. 1980a. Workers in Industrial America: Essays on the Twentieth-Century Struggle. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, David. 1980b. Labor history in the 1970s: Towards a history of the American worker. In Michael Kämmen (ed.), The Past Before Us. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E.H., and Margaret Browne. 1968. A Century of Pay. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Martin, and Peter Philips. 1985. The evolution of labor market structure. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38:392–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Merion Cotter. 1932. Shorter Hours: A Study of the Movement since the Civil War. New York: AMS Press. (Reprint 1971.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G.G. 1976. The challenge of segmented labor market theories to orthodox theory. Journal of Economic Literature 14:1215–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Gregory. 1984. Authority and efficiency: The labor market and the managerial revolution of the late nineteenth-century. Journal of Economic History 44:1069–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, J.R. 1909. American shoemakers, 1648–1895. A sketch of industrial evolution. Quarterly Journal of Economics 24:39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darity, Jr., ed. William 1984. Labor Economics: Modern Views. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. 1974. Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. 1985, CLIO and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. 1986. Industrial labor market adjustment in a region of recent settlement: Chicago 1848–1868. In Peter Kilby (ed.), Quantity and Quiddity: Essays in Honor of Stanley Lebergott. (Forthcoming.)

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A., and Peter Solar. 1977. A bicentenary contribution to the history of the cost of living in America. Research in Economic History 2:1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, Alan. 1976. Class and Community: The Industrial Revolution in Lynn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Andrew. 1979. The paradox of dynamic technologic change and the labor aristocracy in the United States, 1880–1914. Labor History 20:325–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter, and Michael Piore. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dublin, Peter. 1979. Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826–1860. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Greg, and Frank Stafford. 1980. Do union members receive compensating wage differentials?American Economic Review 70:355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, John, and Walter Galenson, (eds.). 1978. Labor in the Twentieth-Century. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, Carville, and Ronald Hoffman. 1980. The foundation of the modern economy agriculture and the costs of labor in the United States and England 1800–1860. American Historical Review 85:1055–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth-Century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and Robert S. Smith. 1985. Modern Labor Economics. 2nd Glen view, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaum, Bernard. 1984. The making and shaping of job and pay structures in the iron and steel industry. In Paul Osterman (ed.), Internal Labor Markets. Cambridge: M.I.T Press. Pp. 71–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Charlotte. 1957. American Industry and the European Immigrant, 1860–1855. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, Mary Locke. 1970. American Manufacturing Exports, 1870–1914. Ph.d. thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faler, Paul G. 1981. Mechanics and Manufacturers in the Early Industrial Revolution: Lynn, Massachusetts, 1780–1860. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearn, Robert. 1981. Labor Economics: The Emerging Synthesis. Cambridge: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Alexander James. 1978. Sectoral shift in antebellum Massachusetts: A reconsideration. Explorations in Economic History 15:146–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Alexander James. 1980. Industrialization and skill intensity: The case of Massachusetts. Journal of Human Resources 15:149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Robert J. 1983. Workplace public goods and union organization. Industrial Relations 22:224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, Thomas, and Belton Knieser. 1984. Labor Economics: Theory, Evidence and Policy. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard, and James L. Medoff. 1984. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galenson, David. 1981. White Servitude in Colonial America: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galenson, David. 1984. The rise and fall of indentured servitude in the Americas: An economic analysis. Journal of Economic History 44:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersuny, Carl, and Gladis Kaufman. 1985. Seniority and the moral economy of U.S. automobile workers, 1934–946. Journal of Social History 18:463–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, Howard M. 1984. Being of two minds: American employers confront the labor problem, 1915–1919. Labor History 25:189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Claudia. 1984. The historical evolution of female earnings, functions and occupations. Explorations in Economic History 21:11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Claudia, and Kenneth Sokoloff. 1982. Women, children and industrialization in the early republic. Journal of Economic History 42:741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Claudia, and Kenneth Sokoloff. 1984. The relative productivity hypothesis of industrialization: The American case, 1820 to 1850. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99:461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, David M., Richard Edwards, and Michael Reich. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, James, R. 1980. The World of the Worker: Labor in Twentieth-Century America. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi. 1969. Capital-skill complementarity. Review of Economics and Statistics 51:465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, Scott D. 1982. On the alleged antebellum surge in wage differentials: A critique of Williamson and Lindert. Journal of Economic History 42:413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, Herbert G. 1977. Work, Culture and Society in Industrializing America. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel, and James Grant. 1979. Econometric studies of labor-labor substitution and their implications for policy. Journal of Human Resources 14:518–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel, and Albert Rees. 1984. The Economics of Work and Pay. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, Joan Underhill. 1982a. Ethnic discrimination in a nineteenth-century mining district. Explorations in Economic History 19:28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, Joan Underhill. 1982b. City size and ethnic discrimination: Michigan agricultural implements and iron working industries, 1890. Journal of Economic History 42:825–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, Frederick H. 1940. Seniority in mass-production industries. Journal of Political Economy 48:851–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, C.K. 1974. Skilled labor and the choice of technique in Edwardian industry. Explorations in Economic History 11:391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heidi. 1979. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism. Capital and Class 8:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, Robert. 1971. Race, skill and earnings: American Immigrants in 1909. Journal of Economic History 31:420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, Robert. 1977. Firm-specific evidence on racial wage differentials and workforce segregation. American Economic Review 67:236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, Robert. 1978a. Racial wage differentials in agriculture: Evidence from North Carolina in 1887. Agricultural History 52:308–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, Robert. 1978b. Race and economy in the South, 1890–1950. In Robert Haws (ed.), The Age of Segregation. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi. Pp. 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P.J. 1975. Relative skills and income levels of native and foreign-born workers in the U.S. Explorations in Economic History 12:47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Saul, 1984. Comment on chapters by Blau and Datcher. In William Darity, Jr., (ed.), Labor Economics. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Robert Max 1984. The Formation of Craft Labor Markets. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Sanford. 1983. Industrial labor mobility in historical perspective. Industrial Relations 22:261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Sanford. 1984. The development of internal labor markets in American manufacturing firms. In Paul Osterman (ed.), International Labor Markets. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press. 23–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Sanford. 1985. Employing Bureaucracy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, John A., and Jonathan S. Skinner. 1985. The resolution of the labor-scarcity paradox. Journal of Economic History 45:513–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Lawrence. 1980. Union and internal labor markets: The case of the San Francisco longshoremen. Labor History 21:369–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Clark. 1983. The intellectual role of the neorealists in labor economics. Industrial Relations 22:298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward P. 1979. Why is there mandatory retirement?Journal of Political Economy 87:1261–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, William, and Thomas Brush. 1985. The “Horndahl Effect” in early U.S. manufacturing. Explorations in Economic History 22:53–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebergott, Stanley. 1964. Manpower in Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. Gregg. 1963. Unionism and Relative Wages in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Clarence. 1960. Wages and Earnings in the United States, 1860–1890. Princeton, NJ: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, Stephen A. 1974. What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economic 6:33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Martha. 1982. The historical problem of the family wage: The Ford Motor Company and the five dollar day. Feminist Studies 8:399–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGouldrick, Paul, and M.B. Tannen. 1977. Did American manufacturers discriminate against immigrants before 1914?Journal of Economic History 37:723–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, Paul J. 1980. The Origins and Development of Labor Economics. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Stephen, III. 1981. The Five Dollar Day: Labor Management and Social Control in the Ford Motor Company, 1908–1921. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, Ruth. 1983. Female factory labor and industrial structure: Control and conflict over “women’s place” in auto and electrical manufacturing. Politics and Society 12:159–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D. Quinn. 1985. Seniority versus ability in promotion decisions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38:421–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Daniel J.B. 1985a. Wage flexibility in the United States: Lessons from the past. American Economic Review 75:36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Daniel J.B. 1985b. Wage flexibility: Then and now. Industrial Relations 24:266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, David. 1979. Workers’ Control in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, David. 1980. To study the people: The American working class. Labor History 21:485–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Daniel. 1975. Managers and Workers. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, Walter. 1962. Labor as a quasi-fixed factor. Journal of Political Economy 70:538–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, Paul. 1980. Getting Started: The Youth Labor Market. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, Paul, ed. 1984. Internal Labor Markets. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne, Robert. 1980. Trends in American labor history. Labor History 21:513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel, John. 1979. Constant-utility index numbers of real wages: Revised estimates. American Economic Review 69:240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael. 1968. The impact of the labor market upon the design and selection of productive techniques within the manufacturing plant. Quarterly Journal of Economics 82:602–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael. 1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Richard. 1984. Theories of Labor Process Formation. Journal of Social History 18(Fall):91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, Roger, and Richard Sutch. 1977. One Kind of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Albert. 1961. Real Wages in Manufacturing, 1890–1914. Princeton, NJ: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Michael. 1984. Segmented labor: Time series hypotheses and evidence. Cambridge Journal of Economics 4:63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan. 1976. Perspectives on Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan, ed. 1969. The American System of Manufactures. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, Russell W., and Martin Carnoy. 1980. Segmentation in the U.S. labor market. Cambridge Journal of Economics 4:117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxonhouse, Gary. 1977. Productivity change and labor absorption in Japanese cotton spinning, 1891–1935. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91:195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxonhouse, Gary, and Gavin Wright. 1984. Two forms of cheap labor in textile history. In Saxonhouse and Wright (eds.), Technique, Spirit, and Form in the Making of the Modern Economies: Essays in Honor of William N. Parker. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press:3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Ronald W. 1983. The Electrical Workers: A History of Labor at GE and Westinghouse 1923–1960. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Ronald W. 1984. Labor historians, labor economics and the question of synthesis. Journal of American History 71:93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Carl, and Joseph Stiglitz. 1984. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review 74:433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenhof, Jacob. 1893. The Economy of High Wages. New York. G.P. Putnam’s Sers (Reprinted 1974, New York: Garland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shergold, Peter R. 1977. Wage differentials based on skill in the United States, 1899–1914: A case study. Labor History 18:485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shergold, Peter R. 1982. Working Class Life: The “American Standard” in Comparative Perspective, 1899–1913. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiells, Martha. 1985. Hours of Work and Shift Work in the Early Industrial Labor Markets of Great Britain, the United States, and Japan. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiells, Martha, and Gavin Wright. 1983. Night work as a labor market phenomenon: Southern textiles in the interwar period. Explorations in Economic History 20:331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlomowitz, Ralph. 1979. The origins of Southern sharecropping. Agricultural History 53:557–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlomowitz, Ralph. 1984. “Bound” or “Free”? Black labor in cotton and sugar cane farming, 1865–1880. Journal of Southern History 50:569–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slichter, Sumner. 1929. The current labor policies of American industries. Quarterly Journal of Economic 43:393–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, Thomas. 1983. The Economics and Politics of Race: An International Perspective. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Katherine. 1974. The origins of job structures in the steel industry. Review of Radical Political Economics 6:61–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strieker, Frank. 1983. Affluence for whom? Another look at prosperity and the working classes in the 1920s. Labor History 24:5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, Stephan. 1964. Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth-century City. Cambridge: Harvard Uinversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, Stephan. 1973. The Other Bostonians. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulman, Lloyd. 1955. The Rise of the National Trade Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Michael. 1980. Recovery and Redistribution Under the NIRA. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Andrew. 1980. Job queues and layoffs in labor markets with flexible wages. Journal of Political economy 88:526–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatley, Warren. 1985. A history of mechanization in the cotton south: The institutional hypothesis, Quarterly Journals of Economics 100:1191–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilentz, Sean. 1984. Against exceptionalism: Class consciousness and the American labor movement. International Labor and Working Class History 26:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Jeffrey, and Peter Lindert. 1980. American Inequality. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Harold. 1984. How new was the new South?Agricultural History 58:529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Gavin. 1979. Cheap labor and Southern textiles before 1880. Journal of Economic History 39:655–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Gavin. 1981. Cheap labor and Southern textiles, 1880–1930. Quarterly Journal of Economics 96:605–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Gavin. 1986. Postbellum Southern labor markets. In Peter Kilby (ed.), Quantity and Quiddity: Essays in Honor of Stanley Lebergott. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellen, Janet. 1984. Efficiency wage models of unemployment. American Economic Review 74:200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Gerald. 1983. Negotiated loyalty: Welfare capitalism and the shoeworkers of Endicott Johnson 1920–1940. Journal of American History 70:602–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieger, Robert H. 1983. Industrial relations and labor history in the eighties. Industrial Relations 22:58–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Kluwer · Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, G. (1987). Labor History and Labor Economics. In: Field, A.J. (eds) The Future of Economic History. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3269-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3269-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7967-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3269-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics