Skip to main content

Would the Value of Clinical Laboratory Science be Increased by Further Written and Material Standards in Histology?

  • Chapter
Clinical Laboratory Science in the Changing Scene of Health Care

Abstract

The task of the histopathologist is to make diagnoses on the basis of microscopic examination of tissues. Histological diagnoses, as all other laboratory results, supply the clinician with evidence for making or confirming his clinical diagnosis and his judgement about prognosis. Furthermore, when recorded in regional, nationwide or international registers, such information may be important for developments in health care and preventive medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henriksen B, (1972). Dysplasia, carcinoma in situ eller carcinoma cervicis uteri. Ugeskr Laeg, 134, 2423–2430.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Delides GS, Garas G, Georgouli G, Jiortziotis D, Lecca J, Liva T and Elemenoglou J, (1982). Intralaboratory variations in the grading of breast carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 106, 126–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Graem N, Helweg-Larsen K and Keiding N, (1980). Precision of histological grading of malignancy. Acta Pathol Microbiol, Scand Section A, 88, 307–317.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jakobsson PA, Eneroth CM, Killander D, Moberger G and Mårtensson B, (1973). Histological classification and grading of malignancy in carcinoma of the larynx. Acta Radiol, 12, 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lund C, Sogaard H, Jorgensen K, Elbrond O, Hjelm-Hansen M and Andersen AP, (1977). Histological grading of epidermoid carcinomas in the head and neck. Dan Med Bull, 24, 162–166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreider JW; Bartlett GL and Butkiewicz BL, (1984). Relationship of tumor leucocytic infiltration to host defense mechanisms and prognosis. Cancer Metast Rev, 3, 53–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Storm HH and Moller-Jensen O, (1985). Regional forskel i cervikale praekankroser. Et klassifikationsproblem. Ugeskr Laeg, 147, 1137–1140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Svanholm H and Mygind H, (1985). Prostatic carcinoma. Reproducibility of histologic grading. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Section A, 93, 67–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rygaard, J. (1987). Would the Value of Clinical Laboratory Science be Increased by Further Written and Material Standards in Histology?. In: Ashby, J.P. (eds) Clinical Laboratory Science in the Changing Scene of Health Care. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3197-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3197-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7934-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3197-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics