Advertisement

Lower gastrointestinal tract radiology with glucagon

  • J. Skucas
Chapter
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Although currently pharmacological agents are widely accepted throughout radiology, some radiologists still do not use these agents at all while others use them only for specific indications. In general, the advent of double contrast techniques and use of hypotonic agents has led to better colon relaxation and, hopefully, to a better diagnosis. With a double contrast barium enema there has also been less dependence upon post-evacuation radiographs.

Keywords

Barium Enema Erythema Multiforme Barium Enema Examination Ileocolic Intussusception Barium Suspension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Porcher P. La stase duodénale provoquée. Procédé simple, rapide et fidèle, d’améliorer la visibilité radiologique et les details de l’image du bulbe ulcéreux. Arch Mai Appar Dig 1944; 33: 24–26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baum M, Howe CT. Hypotonic duodenography in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas and its further use when combined with percutaneous cholangiography and pancreatic scintiscanning. Am J Surg 1968; 115: 519–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilbao MR, Rösch J, Frische LH, Dotter CT. Hypotonic duodenography in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Semin Roentgenol 1968; 3: 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldstein HM, Zboralske FF. Tubeless hypotonic duodenography. J Am Med Assoc 1969; 210: 2086–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Merlo RB, Stone M, Baugus P, Martin M. The use of Pro-Banthine to induce gastrointestinal hypotonia. Radiology 1978; 127: 61–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gelfand DW, Moskowitz M. Massive gastric dilatation complicating hypotonic duodenography. Radiology 1970; 97: 637–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chernish SM, Miller RE, Rosenak BD, Scholz NE. Effect of glucagon on size of visualized human gallbladder before and after a fat meal. Gastroenterology 1972; 62: 1218–1226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chernish SM, Miller RE, Rosenak BD, Scholz NE. Hypotonic duodenography with the use of glucagon. Gastroenterology 1972; 63: 392–398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller RE, Chernish SM, Skucas J, Rosenak BD, Rodda BE. Hypotonic roentgenology with glucagon. Am J Roentgenol 1974; 121: 264–275.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller RE, Chernish SM, Skucas J, Rosenak BD, Rodda BE. Hypotonic colon examination with glucagon. Radiology 1974; 113: 555–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chernish SM, Davidson J A, Brunelle RL, Miller RE, Rosenak BD. Response of normal subjects to a single 2-milligram dose of glucagon administered intramuscularly. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1975; 218: 312–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller RE, Chernish SM, Brunelle RL. Gastrointestinal radiography with glucagon. Gastro-intest Radiol 1979; 4: 1–10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ratcliffe JF. Glucagon in barium examinations in infants and children: special reference to dosage. Br J Radiol 1980; 53: 860–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferrucci JT Jr. Hypotonic barium enema examination. Am J Roentgenol 1972; 116: 304–308.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller RE. La radiologic du colon. J Radiol 1980; 61: 219–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwartz EE, Glick SN, Foggs MB, Silverstein GS. Hypersensitivity reactions after barium enema examination. Am J Roengenol 1984; 143: 103–104.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gelfand DW, Sowers JC, DePonte KA, Sumner TE, Ott DJ. Anaphylactic and allergic reactions during double-contrast studies: Is glucagon or barium suspension the allergen? Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144: 405–406.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harned RK, Stelling CB, Williams S, Wolf GL. Glucagon and barium enema examinations: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Roentgenol 1976; 126: 981–984.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edell SL. Erythema multiforme secondary to intravenous glucagon. Am J Radiol 1980; 134: 385–386.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lawrence AM. Glucagon. Annu Rev Med 1969; 20: 207–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lawrence AM. Glucagon in medicine: new ideas for an old hormone. Med Clin N Am 1970; 54: 183–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gomez-Pan A, Blesa Malpica G, Rodriguez Arnao MD, Oriol Bosch A. Glucagon as a drug. In: Picazo J, ed. Glucagon in Gastroenterology. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1979: 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McLoughlin MJ, Langer B, Wilson DR. Life-threatening reaction to glucagon in a patient with phaeochromocytoma. Radiology 1981; 140: 841–842.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller RE, Skucas J. The Radiological Examination of the Colon. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaude JV, Harty RF. Sensitivity of single contrast barium enema with regard to colorectal disease as diagnosed by colonoscopy. Eur J Radiol 1982; 2: 290–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Teefey SA, Carlson HC. The fluoroscopic barium enema in colonic polyp detection. Am J Radiol 1983; 141: 1279–1281.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnson CD, Carlson HC, Taylor WF, Weiland LP. Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double-and single-contrast studies. Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140: 1143–1149.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gelfand DW, Ott DJ. Single-vs double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statistics. Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 523–528.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Winthrop JD, Balfe DM, Shackelford GD, McAlister WH, Rosenblum JL, Siegel MJ. Ulcerative and granulomatous colitis in children. Radiology 1985; 154: 657–660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ott DJ, Chen YM, Gelfand DW, Wu WC, Munitz HA. Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 993–996.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wolf EL, Frager D, Beneventano TC. Feasibility of double-contrast barium enema in the elderly. Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145: 47–48.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thoeni RF, Vandeman F, Wall SD. Effect of glucagon on the diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast barium enema examinations. Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142: 111–114.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marinelli D, Levine MS, Young M. Importance of sample size for statistical significance. Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143: 923–924.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thoeni RFL. Importance of sample size for statistical significance (Reply). Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143: 924.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Coblentz CL, Frost RA, Molinaro V, Stevenson GW. Pain after barium enema: effect of CO2 and air on double-contrast study. Radiology 1985; 157: 35–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bessette JR, Maglinte DDT. Double-contrast barium enema study: simple conversion to CO2. Radiology 1987; 162: 274–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bernier P. Coblentz C. CO2 delivery system for double-contrast barium enema examinations. Radiology 1986; 159: 264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Violon D, Steppe R, Potvliege R. Improved retrograde ileography with glucagon. Am J Roentgenol 1981; 136: 833–839.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Monsein LH, Halpert RD, Harris ED, Feczko PJ. Retrograde ileography: value of glucagon. Radiology 1986; 161: 558–559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mandell GA, Teplick SK. Glucagon — Its application to childhood gastrointestinal radiology. Gastrointest Radiol 1982; 7: 7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gohel VK, Dalinka MK, Coren GS. Hypotonic examination of the colon with glucagon. Radiology 1975; 115: 1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meeroff JC, Jorgens J, Isenberg JI. The effect of glucagon on barium-enema examination. Radiology 1975; 115: 5–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Levine MS, Gasparaitis AE. Barium filling for glucagon-resistant spasm on double-contrast barium enema examinations. Radiology 1986; 160: 264–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Demas BE, Margulis AR. Combined use of double- and single-contrast barium enema in the evaluation of suspected colonic disease. Gastrointest Radiol 1984; 9: 241–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fisher JK, Germann DR. Glucagon-aided reduction of intussusception. Radiology 1977; 122: 197–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hoy GR, Dunbar D, Boles ET. The use of glucagon in the diagnosis and management of ileocolic intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 1977; 12: 939–944.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lanocita M, Castiglioni G. Impiego del glucagone nella riduzione dell’invaginazione intestinale; presentazione di un caso. Radiol Med (Torino) 1980; 66: 513–516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Coppola V, Verrengia D, Esposito F, Rossi R, Carbonara A. L’ausilio del glucagone nella riduzione idrostatica dell’invaginazione in corso di clisma opaco. Minerva Pediatr 1983; 35: 881–884.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Franken EA Jr, Smith WL, Chernish SM, Campbell JB, Fletcher BD, Goldman HS. The use of glucagon in hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: A double-blind study of 30 patients. Radiology 1983; 146: 687–689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mortensson W, Eklöf O, Laurin S. Hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception. Acta Radiol Diagn 1984; 25: 261–264.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kelvin FM, Gedgaudas RK, Thompson WM, Rice RP. The peroral pneumocolon: its role in evaluating the terminal ileum. Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139: 115–121.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hamlin DJ, Burgener FA, Sischy B. New technique to stage early rectal carcinoma by computed tomography. Radiology 1981; 141: 539–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kreel L, Bydder G. Use of a portable syringe pump for glucagon administration in abdominal computed tomography. Radiology 1980; 136: 507–508.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Skucas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations