Skip to main content

A comparison of phenetic and phylogenetic methods applied to the systematics of Oligochaeta

  • Conference paper
Book cover Aquatic Oligochaeta

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 40))

Abstract

A comparative study of naidid subfamilies shows that a combination of ordination, Jaccard/Average Linkage cluster analysis and Wagner parsimony provides a useful basis for a rational phylogeny but that this does not differ markedly from the original proposed by Sperber nearly four decades ago. Hennig rules, modified by Wiley, permit a preliminary phylogeny and classification of the Annelida to be made by hand. An error in earlier versions suggested that the Dorydrilidae lacked prostate glands, and this is corrected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banfield, C. F. &J. C. Gower, 1980. A note on the graphical representation of multivariate binary data. Appl. Statist. 29: 238–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., 1982. Evolution in the Annelida. Can. J. Zool. 60: 1043–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O ,1984a. The position of the Haplotaxidae in the evolution of the oligochaete annelids. Hydrobiol. 115: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., 1984b. Comments on the evolution of the Annelida. Hydrobiol. 109: 189–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O. &K. A. Coates, 1985. The genus Paranais (Oligoehaeta, Naididae) in North America. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 98: 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camin, J. H. &R. R. Sokal, 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution, 19: 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, K. A., 1987. Redescription of the oligochaete genus Propappus and diagnosis of the new Family Propappidae (Annelida: Oligoehaeta) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M., 1971. A review of classification. J. R. Statist. Soc. A. 134: 321–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, R. V. &M. O. Dayhoff, 1966. Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1966. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erseus, C., 1984. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the gutless Phallodrilinae (Oligoehaeta, Tubificidae), with descriptions of one new genus and twenty-two new species. Zool. Scr. 13:239–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S. &M. F. Mickevitch, 1982. Phylogenetic analysis system (PHYSYS). Fortran V software system of cladistic and phenetic algorithms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1982. Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees. Quart. Rev. Biol. 57: 379–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1983. Statistical inference of phylogenies. J. R. Statist. Soc. A. 146: 246–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1984. Phylogeny inference package (PHYLIP). Version 2.4. Documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C, 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53: 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1978. Phylogenetic and phenetic systematics of the opisthopore Oligoehaeta (Annelida: Clitellata). Evol. Theory, 3: 195–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1980. Preliminary discussion of an Hen- nigian analysis of the phylogeny and systematics of opisthoporous oligochaetes. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 17: 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzak, K., 1984. The previous and contemporary conceptions on phylogeny and systematic classifications of Oligoehaeta (Annelida). Ann. Zool. 38: 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. G. &J. S. Farris, 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. W., 1980. A preliminary numerical evaluation of the tax- onomic characters of Allolobophora auct. and some allies (Lumbricida: Oligoehaeta) occurring in France. Pedobiologia, 20: 212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. &R. R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, C., 1948. A taxonomical study of the Naididae. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 28: 1–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O., 1981. Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley, New York, 439 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brinkhurst, R.O., Nemec, A.F.L. (1987). A comparison of phenetic and phylogenetic methods applied to the systematics of Oligochaeta. In: Brinkhurst, R.O., Diaz, R.J. (eds) Aquatic Oligochaeta. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3091-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3091-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7889-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3091-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics