Skip to main content

Some Logical Distinctions Exploited by Differing Analyses of Pascalian Probability

  • Chapter
  • 133 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 201))

Abstract

At least six different kinds of theory about the semantics and epistemology of Pascalian probability are easily distinguishable in the history of the subject. One kind of theory evaluates probabilities with the help of a principle of indifference, a second by reference to relative frequencies, a third by natural propensities, a fourth by actual or appropriate strength of belief, a fifth by multi-valued logic and a sixth by ratios of logical ranges. What are we to make of this embarrassingly rich diversity of philosophical analyses?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Carnap, R.: (1947), Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: (1950), Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finetti, B. de, (1964), ‘Forsight: its Logical Laws, its Subjective Sources (1937)’. In Studies in Subjective Probability, edited by Kyburg, H.E. and Smokier, H.E.. New York: John Wiley and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.S. de, (1951) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. (1973), Truth, Probability and Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1896), System of Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1938), “Principles of the Theory of Probability”. In Foundations of the Unity of Sciences, edited by Neurath, O., Carnap, R., Morris, C.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1960), Word and Object. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, L.J. (1988). Some Logical Distinctions Exploited by Differing Analyses of Pascalian Probability. In: Agazzi, E. (eds) Probability in the Sciences. Synthese Library, vol 201. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3061-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3061-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7877-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3061-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics