Skip to main content

Abstract

The most interesting impact of telematics on the industries considered has been the redefmition of traditional organizational and industrial boundaries. The examples of interorganizational networks1 in these industries seem to have given many opportunities to influence the key competitive forces that dictate the basis of competition in these industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bain J.S. (1956), Barriers to new competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Ma).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch A. (1987), Telematics, inter-organization and economic performance, FAST Occasional paper, n.195, Bruxelles,(mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blois KJ. (1987), Vertical quasi-integration, The Journal of Industrial Economics, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein Y.M.-White LJ.(1985), Setting Technical Compatibility Standards: an Economic Analysis, The Antitrust Bulletin, Summer, p.337 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, D.W. — MJ. Klamer (1983), The Need for Coordination among Firms, With Special Reference to Network Industries, University of Chicago Law Review, 50, p.446 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash J. — O‘Callaghan R. (1985), The Impact of Computers and Communications on Competitive Strategy. The Case of Interorganizational Systems, Fifth Annual Strategic Management Society Conference, Barcelona, (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. — T. Sandler (1986), The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department Of Trade (1982), Standards, Quality and International Competitiveness (White Paper), HMSO: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvybig, P.H. — C.S. Spatt (1983), Adoption Externalities as Public Goods, Journal of Public Economics, 20, p.231 ss.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enrietti A. (1983), Industria automobilistica: la „quasi integrazione verticale“ come madello intepretativo dei rapporti tra le imprese, Economia e Politica Industriale, n.38, pp.39–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. — G. Saloner (1985a), Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation, Rand Journal of Economics, 16-1 (Spring), p.70 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. — G. Saloner (1986a), Standardization and Variety, Economics Letters, 20, p.71 ss.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. — G. Saloner (1986b), Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation, American Economic Review, 76-5 (December), p.940 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • FTU (Fondation Travail Université) (1987) Effects structurants de la télématique sur les industries: les cas de la petrochimie et de la grande distribution, Fast Occasional Papers n.111, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, H.L. (1987), Product Standardization and Competitive Strategy, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemenway, D. (1975), Industrywide Voluntary Product Standards, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.L. — C. Shapiro (1985), Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, American Economic Review, 75 (June), p.424 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.L. — C. Shapiro (1986a), Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, 94-4 (August), p. 822 s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.L. — C. Shapiro (1986b), Product Compatibility Choice in a Market with Technological Progress, Oxford Economic Papers, 38 — suppl. (November), p.146 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. (1983), Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods, Kyklos, 36-3, p.337 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecra W, DJ. (1984), Some Economic Effects of Standards, Applied Economics, 16, p.507 ss.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. (1983), Market Structure and Voluntary Product Standards, Applied Economics, 15, p.393 ss.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, J. (1987), The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization, Journal of Common Market Studies, p.249 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980), Competitive strategy, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfs, J. (1974), A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communication Service, Bell Journal of Economics, p. 16 ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli H.B. (1986), Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal, n. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veall, M.R. (1985), On Product Standardization as Competition Policy, Canadian Journal of Economics, 18-2 (May), p. 416 ss.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fornengo, G. (1988). Interorganizational Networks and Market Structures. In: Antonelli, C. (eds) New Information Technology and Industrial Change: The Italian Case. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3001-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3001-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7848-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3001-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics